132 80

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author김태웅-
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-21T04:35:49Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-21T04:35:49Z-
dc.date.issued2023-12-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, v. 50, article no. 101538, Page. 1.0-17.0-
dc.identifier.issn2214-5818;2214-5818-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214581823002252?pes=voren_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.hanyang.ac.kr/handle/20.500.11754/187534-
dc.description.abstractStudy region: Gyeongsang province in Korea Study focus: Drought is a complex phenomenon influencing the natural, physical, and social sectors depending on the occurrence probability, regional characteristics, and the water supply and demand. To reduce the damage resulting from drought, it is necessary to assess the drought risk that can identify the impacts, causes, and vulnerability of drought. Previous drought risk assessment has usually been conducted by combining drought hazard and vulnerability, but such assessment is of limited value because the regional response capacity for drought is not considered. Moreover, it contains high uncertainty because indicators and weighting factors are determined by subjective methods. In this study, the comprehensive drought risk was assessed including the drought response capacity and with consideration of the regional water supply system. To remove the uncertainty in the drought risk assessment, this study employed partial least squares – structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) to select effective indicators including the regional drought response capacity, and also applied objective weighting methods such as entropy, principal component analysis (PCA), Gaussian mixture model (GMM), and Bayesian networks to determine optimal weighting factors. New hydrological insights into the region under study: As a result of application to Gyeongsang province in Korea, PLS-SEM selected 10 indicators for drought risk assessment. Using the selected indicators and the objective weighting methods, this study determined that the drought hazard, vulnerability, response capacity, and risk were highest in GS26 (Ulleung), GS27 (Changwon), GS16 (Cheongsong), and GS28 (Jinju), respectively. The districts with large actual drought damage had high drought risk, indicating that the results of this study were reasonable and useful in the identification of the major impacts and risk of regional drought and may facilitate the decision-making process for selecting drought countermeasures to reduce drought risk. © 2023 The Authors-
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by Korea Environment Industry & Technology Institute through Water Management Innovation Program for Drought (No. 2022003610001 , funded by Korea Ministry of Environment ) and the research fund of Hanyang University ( HY-2022-2893 ).-
dc.languageen-
dc.publisherElsevier BV-
dc.subjectBayesian network-
dc.subjectDrought response capacity-
dc.subjectDrought risk-
dc.subjectStructural equation model-
dc.subjectWater supply system-
dc.titleComprehensive drought risk assessment using structural equation modeling and objective weighting methods-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.relation.volume50-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101538-
dc.relation.page1.0-17.0-
dc.relation.journalJournal of Hydrology: Regional Studies-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Ji Eun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoo, Jiyoung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKwon, Hyun-Han-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Tae-Woong-
dc.sector.campusE-
dc.sector.daehak공학대학-
dc.sector.department건설환경공학과-
dc.identifier.pidtwkim72-
dc.identifier.article101538-


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE