Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author육세진-
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-28T04:35:50Z-
dc.date.available2018-05-28T04:35:50Z-
dc.date.issued2016-05-
dc.identifier.citationENERGY AND BUILDINGS, v. 119, Page. 111-118en_US
dc.identifier.issn0378-7788-
dc.identifier.issn1872-6178-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778816301645?via%3Dihub-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.hanyang.ac.kr/handle/20.500.11754/71552-
dc.description.abstractIn general, room air cleaners are rated according to clean air delivery rate (CADR). However, ventilation systems have not yet been assessed using a metric similar to CADR. This study establishes a new mass balance equation that compares the CADRs of a ventilation system and a room air cleaner. Experiments and CFD simulations were conducted to evaluate and compare the CADRs of room air cleaners and ventilation system in the view of removing particles from indoor air. In addition, the operating cost effectiveness of ventilation system and room air cleaner was investigated. The results showed that the room air cleaners showed their performance independently, even when two or more room air cleaners were operated simultaneously. In the ventilation system, an air filter with MERV11 or higher rating was recommended to reduce the indoor particle concentration when 100% outdoor air was supplied. It was possible to select an air filter with MERV11 or lower rating when the recirculation airflow rate was increasing up to 70%. The CADR of the room air cleaner was higher than that of the ventilation system regardless of the particle size and the filter performance when the airflow rate was same. The operating cost effectiveness (CADR/kW) of the room air cleaner was higher than that of the ventilation system at the same airflow rate. Therefore, the room air cleaner must be more cost-effective than the ventilation system for reducing particle concentration indoors. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis subject is supported by Korea Ministry of Environment as "The Environmental Health Action Program (No. 2013001350005)"en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE SAen_US
dc.subjectAir cleaneren_US
dc.subjectClean air delivery rate (CADR)en_US
dc.subjectOperating cost effectivenessen_US
dc.subjectParticleen_US
dc.subjectVentilationen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of clean air delivery rates and operating cost effectiveness for room air cleaner and ventilation system in a small lecture roomen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.volume119-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.03.027-
dc.relation.page111-118-
dc.relation.journalENERGY AND BUILDINGS-
dc.contributor.googleauthorNoh, Kwang-Chul-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYook, Se-Jin-
dc.relation.code2016007202-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF ENGINEERING[S]-
dc.sector.departmentDIVISION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING-
dc.identifier.pidysjnuri-
Appears in Collections:
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING[S](공과대학) > MECHANICAL ENGINEERING(기계공학부) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE