JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 339(1-2), P.237-238
Abstract
I appreciate the important comments of Kamali et al. First, those authors mentioned the possible false negativity of the results concerning the corticobulbar tracts, because of their high angulation and the dense crossing fibers in the centrum semiovale. Second, they pointed out the possible contamination with the corticopontocerebellar tracts in our tractography studies.