Smoke, but No Fire? In Social Science, Focus on the Most Distinct Part
- Title
- Smoke, but No Fire? In Social Science, Focus on the Most Distinct Part
- Author
- 은용수
- Issue Date
- 2014-02
- Publisher
- American Political Science Association
- Citation
- Political Science, Volume 47, Issue 1, pp. 145-148
- Abstract
- Causality in social science is hard to establish even through the finest comparative research. To ease the task of extracting causes from comparisons, we present the benefits of tracing particularities in any phenomenon under investigation. We introduce three real-world examples from 2011: British riots, worldwide anticapitalist protests, and the highway crash near Taunton in southwestern England. Whereas all of these three examples have broad causes, we embark on the quest after specific factors. The Taunton accident can send a powerful message to social scientists, which is about the danger of making general statements in their explanations. Instead of saying much but explaining little, the merit of singling out the specific is substantial. As social scientists, when we are faced with “smoke” but no “fire,” let us then focus on the part that is distinct.
- URI
- https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/article/smoke-but-no-fire-in-social-science-focus-on-the-most-distinct-part/6F4260CA25DA9F457AF9361D390F7FDE#http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11754/49416
- ISSN
- 1049-0965; 1537-5935
- DOI
- 10.1017/S104909651300156XP
- Appears in Collections:
- COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES[S](사회과학대학) > ETC
- Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
- Export
- RIS (EndNote)
- XLS (Excel)
- XML