388 0

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author이지연-
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-16T05:22:11Z-
dc.date.available2018-03-16T05:22:11Z-
dc.date.issued2014-04-
dc.identifier.citation한국복식학회지, 2014, 64(3), P.93-107en_US
dc.identifier.issn1229-6880-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.dbpia.co.kr/Article/NODE06676048-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11754/47867-
dc.description.abstractThis study examines the differences in store service quality and relationship benefits according to clothing consumption values. This study has collected data from adult consumers in their 20s to 60s via offline and online surveys. A total of 459 survey responses were used for the final analysis. The results of this study were as follows. First, clothing consumption values were composed of 4 factors: emotional, conspicuous, individuality, and practical value. In light of the tendency of consumers` clothing consumption values, consumers have been grouped into 3 consumption groups: hedonic, practical, and practical·symbolic. Second, consumers considered price policy·product quality, salesperson, product assortment·promotion, and convenience of store service quality in the order of importance. Regarding the relationship benefit, consumers considered psychological benefit, economic benefit, informative benefit and social benefit in the order of importance. Third, regarding the importance in service quality for clothing consumption value group, practical·symbolic consumption group and practical consumption group considered price policy·quality service more important than hedonic consumption group, and practical·symbolic consumption group considered product assortment·quality, promotion service, salesperson service, convenience of store service more important than other groups. Fourth, regarding the importance of relationship benefits for the clothing consumption value groups, practical·symbolic consumption group considered informative benefit and social benefit more important than other groups. The practical·symbolic consumption group and practical consumption group considered psychological benefit more important than the hedonic consumption group.en_US
dc.language.isoko_KRen_US
dc.publisher한국복식학회 The Korean Society of Costumeen_US
dc.subject관계혜택en_US
dc.subject서비스품질en_US
dc.subjectclothing consumption valuesen_US
dc.subjectrelationship benefitsen_US
dc.subjectservice qualityen_US
dc.title패션제품 소비자의 의복소비가치에 따른 점포 서비스품질 및 관계혜택 중요도en_US
dc.title.alternativeImportance of Store Service Quality and Relationship Benefits according to Clothing Consumption Values of Consumers of Fashion Productsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.no3-
dc.relation.volume64-
dc.relation.page93-107-
dc.relation.journal복식-
dc.contributor.googleauthor박혜선-
dc.contributor.googleauthor박재옥-
dc.contributor.googleauthor이지연-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, Hye Sun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, Jae Ok-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Ji Yeon-
dc.relation.code2014001031-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF HUMAN ECOLOGY[S]-
dc.sector.departmentDEPARTMENT OF CLOTHING & TEXTILES-
dc.identifier.pidchannyblue-
Appears in Collections:
COLLEGE OF HUMAN ECOLOGY[S](생활과학대학) > CLOTHING & TEXTILES(의류학과) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE