Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author김태웅-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-09T01:07:25Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-09T01:07:25Z-
dc.date.issued2022-10-10-
dc.identifier.citationClimate, v. 10, no 10, page. 1-17en_US
dc.identifier.issn2225-1154en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/2225-1154/10/10/147en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.hanyang.ac.kr/handle/20.500.11754/191465-
dc.description.abstractRunoff plays an essential part in the hydrological cycle, as it regulates the quantity of water which flows into streams and returns surplus water into the oceans. Runoff modelling may assist in understanding, controlling, and monitoring the quality and amount of water resources. The aim of this article is to discuss various categories of rainfall–runoff models, recent developments, and challenges of rainfall–runoff models in flood prediction in the modern era. Rainfall–runoff models are classified into conceptual, empirical, and physical process-based models depending upon the framework and spatial processing of their algorithms. Well-known runoff models which belong to these categories include the Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) model, Storm Water Management model (SWMM), Hydrologiska Byråns Vattenbalansavdelning (HBV) model, Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model, and the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) model, etc. In addition, the data-driven models such as Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Deep Neural Network (DNN), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) have proven to be better performance solutions in runoff modelling and flood prediction in recent decades. The data-driven models detect the best relationship based on the input data series and the output in order to model the runoff process. Finally, the strengths and downsides of the outlined models in terms of understanding variation in runoff modelling and flood prediction were discussed. The findings of this comprehensive study suggested that hybrid models for runoff modeling and flood prediction should be developed by combining the strengths of traditional models and machine learning methods. This article suggests future research initiatives that could help with filling existing gaps in rainfall–runoff research and will also assist hydrological scientists in selecting appropriate rainfall–runoff models for flood prediction and mitigation based on their benefits and drawbacks.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThanks to peer reviewers who improved this manuscript. We thank the Lower-Level and Core Disaster Safety Technology Development Program funded by the Ministry of Interior and Safety (Grant No. 2020-MOIS33-006).en_US
dc.languageen_USen_US
dc.publisherMDPI AGen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesv. 10, no 10;1-17-
dc.subjectrainfall–runoffen_US
dc.subjectdata-driven modellingen_US
dc.subjecthydrological modelsen_US
dc.subjectmachine learningen_US
dc.subjectprocess-based modellingen_US
dc.subjectflood mitigationen_US
dc.titleComprehensive Review: Advancements in Rainfall-Runoff Modelling for Flood Mitigationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.no10-
dc.relation.volume10-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/cli10100147en_US
dc.relation.page1-17-
dc.relation.journalClimate-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJehanzaib, Muhammad-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAjmal, Muhammad-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAchite, Mohammed-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Tae-Woong-
dc.relation.code2022007384-
dc.sector.campusE-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES[E]-
dc.sector.departmentDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-
dc.identifier.pidtwkim72-
Appears in Collections:
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES[E](공학대학) > CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING(건설환경공학과) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE