Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author송범종-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-24T07:51:16Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-24T07:51:16Z-
dc.date.issued2020-07-
dc.identifier.citationEXPERIMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE, v. 52, no. 7, page. 1016-1027en_US
dc.identifier.issn2092-6413-
dc.identifier.issn1226-3613-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002608838-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.hanyang.ac.kr/handle/20.500.11754/169398-
dc.description.abstractThe CRISPR-Cas system has undoubtedly revolutionized the genome editing field, enabling targeted gene disruption, regulation, and recovery in a guide RNA-specific manner. In this review, we focus on currently available gene recovery strategies that use CRISPR nucleases, particularly for the treatment of genetic disorders. Through the action of DNA repair mechanisms, CRISPR-mediated DNA cleavage at a genomic target can shift the reading frame to correct abnormal frameshifts, whereas DNA cleavage at two sites, which can induce large deletions or inversions, can correct structural abnormalities in DNA. Homology-mediated or homology-independent gene recovery strategies that require donor DNAs have been developed and widely applied to precisely correct mutated sequences in genes of interest. In contrast to the DNA cleavage-mediated gene correction methods listed above, base-editing tools enable base conversion in the absence of donor DNAs. In addition, CRISPR-associated transposases have been harnessed to generate a targeted knockin, and prime editors have been developed to edit tens of nucleotides in cells. Here, we introduce currently developed gene recovery strategies and discuss the pros and cons of each.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by grants from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) (no. 2018M3A9H3022412), the Next Generation BioGreen 21 Program (PJ01319301), the Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project (HI16C1012), and the Technology Innovation Program (no. 20000158) to S.B.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNATURE PUBLISHING GROUPen_US
dc.subjectHOMOLOGY-DIRECTED REPAIRen_US
dc.subjectPLURIPOTENT STEM-CELLSen_US
dc.subjectMUSCULAR-DYSTROPHYen_US
dc.subjectGENOMIC DNAen_US
dc.subjectMOUSE MODELen_US
dc.subjectBASEen_US
dc.subjectMUTATIONen_US
dc.subjectEFFICIENTen_US
dc.subjectHEMOPHILIAen_US
dc.subjectDONORen_US
dc.titleCurrent trends in gene recovery mediated by the CRISPR-Cas systemen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.no7-
dc.relation.volume52-
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s12276-020-0466-1-
dc.relation.page1016-1027-
dc.relation.journalEXPERIMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJang, Hyeon-Ki-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSong, Beomjong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHwang, Gue-Ho-
dc.contributor.googleauthorBae, Sangsu-
dc.relation.code2020046115-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakRESEARCH INSTITUTE[S]-
dc.sector.departmentRESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR CONVERGENCE OF BASIC SCIENCES-
dc.identifier.pidantares09-


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE