유기론적 해석을 통한 위상기하학적 구축에 대한 연구

Abstract

현대사회의 급격한 변화에 따라 우리의 의식과 가치관은 물론 우리의 생활을 담는 공간까지 변화가 일어나고 있다. 기존의 정형적인 틀에서 벗어나 보다 새로운 프로그램들에 적합한 융통성을 지닌 공간을 필요하게 되었다. 근대건축에서의 공간구성의 원리는 기능과 프로그램을 바탕으로 하는 기능주의적 원리로 볼 수 있으나 현대건축에서는 기존의 형태나 공간구성 방식을 탈피하려는 시도들이 나타나고 있다. 최근에 새롭게 나타나는 일련의 건축 디자인은 여러 가지 유기체의 특징 이런 다양한 요구를 수용하기 위해 과거부터 여러 건축가들이 드로잉으로 유기체의 형상을 구현하였듯 현재 다양하게 적용되고 있는 디지털 건축과의 연관성을 찾아내어 유기체의 형상을 건축적으로 구축하기 위한 최적의 방법을 도출해 보고자 한다. 유기적 특성을 확인하고, 디지털 건축으로 구축하기 위한 매개체로서 위상기하학의 특성을 분석하여 유기체와 위상기하학 그리고 디지털 건축으로 이어지는 가능성을 찾아내어 비선형적(nonlinear)이고 혼성적(heterogeneous)인 특성을 가지고 있는 연속적인 공간의 구축의 가능성을 모색해 본다. 본 논문에서는 실제로 위상기하학 기반의 디지털 건축기법이 유기체의 형상을 구축하는데 얼마나 효율적이며 적합한지를 확인해보기 위해 서귀포 수족관을 직접 설계하고 그 과정에 직접 유기적 디자인의 디지털 구축기법을 적용함으로서 기존의 건축과는 어떠한 부분에서 차이점이 있는지 확인한다.; The purpose of this study is to investigate general L2 proficiency (measured by TOEIC scores), the speed of lexical access (measured by reaction time), and lexical comprehension accuracy based on error rates from the LAT (Lexical Access Test). According to some SLA studies(Akamatsu, 2001; Ackerman, 1988), speedy lexical access ability is regarded as one of the most important factors in achieving automaticity. Therefore, the speed of lexical access was tested to judge learners' cognitive processing ability in an indirect way. The following research questions were examined for this study: 1) To what extent are L2 general proficiency and the speed of lexical access related? 2) In terms of the speed of lexical comprehension, what differences are attested between native speakers and Korean learner groups? 3) Does L2 general proficiency affect lexical comprehension accuracy? 4) In terms of accuracy of lexical comprehension, what differences are attested between native speakers and Korean learner groups? A total of sixty Korean university students and some university graduates participated in the study. They were divided into two groups: the advanced learner group and the lower learner group, each of which had 30 participants. The advanced learner group was compared to a group of 17 native speakers in order to ascertain the difference in terms of the speed and accuracy of lexical comprehension. The LAT (Lexical Access Test) was conducted to measure lexical comprehension speed and accuracy by all participants. The findings can be summarized as follows: First, there were not statistically significant differences in the speed of lexical access between the advanced learner and lower learner groups. This indicates that L2 proficiency measured by TOEIC does not lead to speedy lexical access ability. Secondly, in terms of the speed and accuracy of lexical comprehension between the native speakers and the Korean learners, there were significant differences. This implies that even if advanced learners have highly developed linguistic knowledge, continuous efforts are required to become a native-like speaker. Thirdly, it appeared that L2 proficiency was related to lexical comprehension accuracy (measured by error rates from LAT). This demonstrates that L2 proficiency measured by TOEIC is considered to include formal aspects of language such as grammar and lexis. These findings bring about some consideration for enhancing automaticity: to get a high score on the TOEIC test could help to improve linguistic knowledge. However, it does not guarantee speedy cognitive processing. Therefore, learners should recognize that promoting speedy cognitive processing and acquiring linguistic knowledge from an SLA point of view are two different processes. With respect to these results, it is recommended that learning English accompany linguistic knowledge with repetitive practice and experiences for practical performance development.