204 0

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author곽동엽-
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-09T05:05:28Z-
dc.date.available2020-01-09T05:05:28Z-
dc.date.issued2017-08-
dc.identifier.citationEARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, v. 33, No. 3, Page. 1191-1218en_US
dc.identifier.issn8755-2930-
dc.identifier.issn1944-8201-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.earthquakespectra.org/doi/abs/10.1193/072316EQS117EP-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.hanyang.ac.kr/handle/20.500.11754/121638-
dc.description.abstractWe synthesize engineering procedures for estimating the seismic performance of major flood-control levees as given in guidelines documents and design codes from Canada (British Columbia), China, Italy, Japan, New Zealand, and the United States. Some guidelines carry the weight of law whereas compliance is optional for others. Most procedures combine a probabilistic ground motion characterization with deterministic assessments of levee performance (uncoupled approach). Ground motions are typically described using peak accelerations for reference site conditions at return periods typically ranging from 100 to 2,475 years. Those motions are deterministically modified for soil conditions using numerical simulations or ergodic site factors. Accompanying hydrological conditions are either not specified or are taken at a frequently encountered water level (ranging from mean annual to a four-month flood event). These demands are used in combination with various soil properties to assess the potential for liquefaction, flow failure, and permanent shear deformations. Drawing upon best practices identified from this review, we recommend procedures for levee risk assessment at the section-level and for levee systems.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by California Department of Water and Resource (CA-DWR) under contract number 4600008849. This funding source is gratefully acknowledged. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the CA-DWR and FOREM. We thank Grant Lovell at Tonkin and Taylor for providing useful information on New Zealand guidelines. We also thank Derek Wilshere, Secretary of the New Zealand society of large dams (NZSOLD), for providing access to the New Zealand dam safety guidelines (2015). We thank Ramon Verdugo at Universidad de Chile, and Victor A. Contreras Luarte at UCLA for providing information on Chile procedures. We also thank Steve Mahnke at CA-DWR, Leslie F. Harder, Jr. at HDR Inc., and Vlad G. Perlea and George Hu at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for their useful suggestions as part of an expert review panel for this work.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherEARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING RESEARCH INSTen_US
dc.titleProcedures from International Guidelines for Assessing Seismic Risk to Flood-Control Leveesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.no3-
dc.relation.volume33-
dc.identifier.doi10.1193/072316EQS117EP-
dc.relation.page1191-1218-
dc.relation.journalEARTHQUAKE SPECTRA-
dc.contributor.googleauthorZimmaro, Paolo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKwak, Dong Youp-
dc.contributor.googleauthorStewart, Jonathan P.-
dc.contributor.googleauthorBrandenberg, Scott J.-
dc.contributor.googleauthorBalakrishnan, Ariya-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJongejan, Ruben-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAusilio, Ernesto-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDente, Giovanni-
dc.contributor.googleauthorXie, Junju-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMikami, Atsushi-
dc.relation.code2017001256-
dc.sector.campusE-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES[E]-
dc.sector.departmentDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-
dc.identifier.piddkwak-
Appears in Collections:
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES[E](공학대학) > CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING(건설환경공학과) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE