288 0

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author정재원-
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-30T19:01:01Z-
dc.date.available2019-11-30T19:01:01Z-
dc.date.issued2017-09-
dc.identifier.citationBUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, v. 122, page. 61-71en_US
dc.identifier.issn0360-1323-
dc.identifier.issn1873-684X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132317302305?via%3Dihub-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.hanyang.ac.kr/handle/20.500.11754/115690-
dc.description.abstractAirtightness measurement standards using the fan pressurization method are widely used for measuring residential units such as detached houses and apartment units. The measurement of airtightness for small buildings can be readily conducted through existing fan pressurization methods. However, it can be difficult to achieve accurate measurement results for large buildings, as the height and volume of the buildings are considerably increased. This paper empirically investigates factors that are to be considered in regard to airflow rate (Q) and pressure difference (Delta P), which are measurement values required for deriving more accurate airtightness values for large buildings. The specifications of the standards ISO 9972, EN 13829, ASTM E779, JIS A 2201, ATTMA TS 1, and CAN/CGSB 149.15 relating to Q. and Delta P are compared. Test conditions with respect to Q and Delta P are discussed for large building airtightness measurements. In measuring airtightness, a method is proposed in which the pressure difference at each floor of the building is measured and an average pressure difference value is used. Experiments were conducted on two multi-story office buildings using the method based on measuring pressure difference according to existing standards in tandem with the proposed pressure difference measurement method. The results of the experimental study show that the vertical pressure distribution across the overall building envelope can be significantly different when a building is pressurized. The airtightness values may also be different according to the measurement methods. This paper demonstrates how important it is to derive accurate Delta P values in measuring large building airtightness. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (NRF-2014R1A2A1A11051236).en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherPERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTDen_US
dc.subjectAirtightnessen_US
dc.subjectLarge buildingen_US
dc.subjectPressurization testen_US
dc.subjectPressure differenceen_US
dc.subjectStandarden_US
dc.subjectField testen_US
dc.titleExperimental study on airtightness test methods in large buildingsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.no1-
dc.relation.volume122-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.06.003-
dc.relation.page61-71-
dc.relation.journalBUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Dong-Seok-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJeong, Jae-Weon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJo, Jun-Hun-
dc.relation.code2017011893-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF ENGINEERING[S]-
dc.sector.departmentDEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING-
dc.identifier.pidjjwarc-
Appears in Collections:
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING[S](공과대학) > ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING(건축공학부) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE