Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author조태홍-
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-29T22:13:39Z-
dc.date.available2019-11-29T22:13:39Z-
dc.date.issued2017-08-
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF PHONETICS, v. 64, page. 71-89en_US
dc.identifier.issn0095-4470-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095447016301437?via%3Dihub-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.hanyang.ac.kr/handle/20.500.11754/115299-
dc.description.abstractThis study explores the relationship between prosodic strengthening and linguistic contrasts in English by examining temporal realization of nasals (N-duration) in CV (N) under bar# and #(N) under bar VC, and their coarticulatory influence on vowels (V-nasalization). Results show that different sources of prosodic strengthening bring about different types of linguistic contrasts. Prominence enhances the consonants [nasality] as reflected in an elongation of N duration, but it enhances the vowel's [orality] (rather than [nasality]) showing coarticulatory resistance to the nasal influence even when the nasal is phonologically focused (e.g., mob-bob; bomb-bob). Boundary strength induces different types of enhancement patterns as a function of prosodic position (initial vs. final). In the domain-initial position, boundary strength reduces the consonant's [nasality] as evident in a shortening of N-duration and a reduction of V-nasalization, thus enhancing CV contrast. The opposite is true with the domain-final nasal in which N-duration is lengthened accompanied by greater V-nasalization, showing coarticulatory vulnerability. The systematic coarticulatory variation as a function of prosodic factors indicates that V-nasalization as a coarticulatory process is indeed under speaker control, fine-tuned in a linguistically significant way. In dynamical terms, these results may be seen as coming from differential intergestural coupling relationships that may underlie the difference in V-nasalization in CVN# vs. #NVC. It is proposed that the timing initially determined by such coupling relationships must be fine-tuned by prosodic strengthening in a way that reflects the relationship between dynamical underpinnings of speech timing and linguistic contrasts. (C) 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipWe would like to thank Will Styler and Rebecca Scarborough for letting us use their Praat scripts for extracting A1-PO values, and Jiyoung Jang for her assistance. A preliminary version of this paper (with a smaller number of subjects) was presented at the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences 2015, Glasgow, UK (Cho, Kim, & Kim, 2015). Part of the data reported here was used in the second author's MA thesis at Hanyang University (Seoul, Korea). This work was supported by Global Research Network program through the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2016S1A2A2912410).en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTDen_US
dc.subjectVowel nasalizationen_US
dc.subjectCoarticulationen_US
dc.subjectCoarticulatory resistanceen_US
dc.subjectProsodic strengtheningen_US
dc.subjectProminenceen_US
dc.subjectBoundaryen_US
dc.subjectPhonetic grammaren_US
dc.titleProsodically-conditioned fine-tuning of coarticulatory vowel nasalization in Englishen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.volume64-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.wocn.2016.12.003-
dc.relation.page71-89-
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF PHONETICS-
dc.contributor.googleauthorCho, Taehong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Daejin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Sahyang-
dc.relation.code2017014593-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF HUMANITIES[S]-
dc.sector.departmentDEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE & LITERATURE-
dc.identifier.pidtcho-


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE