207 0

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author한상욱-
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-20T09:46:00Z-
dc.date.available2019-11-20T09:46:00Z-
dc.date.issued2017-02-
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, v. 31, no. 4, Article no. 04017010en_US
dc.identifier.issn0887-3801-
dc.identifier.issn1943-5487-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29CP.1943-5487.0000655-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.hanyang.ac.kr/handle/20.500.11754/112697-
dc.description.abstractWorkers in the construction industry are frequently exposed to physically demanding manual tasks with a high level of ergonomic risk. To prevent ergonomic injuries and disorders, posture-based ergonomic evaluation methods, which require inputs describing the worker's posture (e.g.,body joint angles), have been developed and are used widely in practice. However, the reliability of these ergonomic methods has not been investigated fully from the input measurement perspective, as when collected by a human observer or motion capture sensors, and which may inevitably contain measurement errors (e.g.,human perception errors and sensing errors in estimating human postures). Thus, this study examines the imprecision associated with acquiring the required inputs for ergonomic assessment and investigates its impact on the final result of the analysis. The two primary methods of obtaining the inputs of posture-based evaluation tools, i.e.,human observation and recordings of motion sensing devices, were examined, and a stochastic approach was proposed to evaluate the impact of the input errors on the final result of the ergonomic assessment. The findings indicate that the imprecision associated with inputs from both visual observers and sensors have significant impact on the results of ergonomic analysis and should be incorporated into the analysis accordingly. The contribution of this paper allows practitioners and researchers to understand possible ranges of outputs that can be caused by observation and measurement errors, and to determine allowable tolerance of sensing errors required for ergonomic evaluation through stochastic analysis.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors would like to thank the survey participants for the human observation errors experiment. The work presented in this paper was supported financially by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and Hanyang University (HY-2016). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSERC.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERSen_US
dc.subjectErgonomicsen_US
dc.subjectWork-related musculoskeletal disorder (WMSD)en_US
dc.subjectConstruction worker safetyen_US
dc.subjectFuzzy logicen_US
dc.subjectRapid upper limb assessment (RULA)en_US
dc.subjectMotion sensingen_US
dc.titleStochastic Modeling for Assessment of Human Perception and Motion Sensing Errors in Ergonomic Analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.no4-
dc.relation.volume31-
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000655-
dc.relation.page1-11-
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGolabchi, Alireza-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHan, SangUk-
dc.contributor.googleauthorFayek, Aminah Robinson-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAbouRizk, Simaan-
dc.relation.code2017002205-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF ENGINEERING[S]-
dc.sector.departmentDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-
dc.identifier.pidsanguk-
Appears in Collections:
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING[S](공과대학) > CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING(건설환경공학과) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE