278 212

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author정윤선-
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-17T02:04:21Z-
dc.date.available2019-07-17T02:04:21Z-
dc.date.issued2019-02-
dc.identifier.citationCANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, Page. 1-5en_US
dc.identifier.issn1598-2998-
dc.identifier.issn2005-9256-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.e-crt.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.4143/crt.2018.423#-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.hanyang.ac.kr/handle/20.500.11754/107491-
dc.description.abstractPurpose This first Korean prospective study is to evaluate the feasibility of prone breast radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery for left breast cancer patients who have relatively small breast size and we present dosimetric comparison between prone and supine positions. Materials and Methods Fifty patients underwent two computed tomography (CT) simulations in supine and prone positions. Whole breast, ipsilateral lung, heart, and left-anterior-descending coronary artery were contoured on each simulation CT images. Tangential-fields treatment plan in each position was designed with total 50 Gy in 2-Gy fractions, and then one of the positions was designated for the treatment by comparing target coverage and dose to normal organs. Also, interfractional and intrafractional motion was evaluated using portal images. Results In total 50 patients, 32 cases were decided as prone-position-beneficial group and 18 cases as supine-position-beneficial group based on dosimetric advantage. Target dose homogeneity was comparable, but target conformity in prone position was closer to optimal than in supine position. For both group, prone position significantly increased lung volume. However, heart volume was decreased by prone position for prone-position-beneficial group but was comparable between two positions for supine-position-beneficial group. Lung and heart doses were significantly decreased by prone position for prone-position-beneficial group. However, prone position for supine-position-beneficial group increased heart dose while decreasing lung dose. Prone position showed larger interfractional motion but smaller intrafractional motion than supine position. Conclusion Prone breast radiotherapy could be beneficial to a subset of small breast patients since it substantially spared normal organs while achieving adequate target coverage.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research has been supported by Korean Breast Cancer Foundation 14-03.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKOREAN CANCER ASSOCIATIONen_US
dc.subjectClinical trialen_US
dc.subjectLeft-sided breast neoplasmsen_US
dc.subjectRadiotherapyen_US
dc.subjectProne positionen_US
dc.titleKorean First Prospective Phase II Study, Feasibility of Prone Position in Postoperative Whole Breast Radiotherapy: A Dosimetric Comparisonen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4143/crt.2018.423-
dc.relation.page1-5-
dc.relation.journalCANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChung, Yoonsun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYu, Jeong Il-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, Won-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChoi, Doo Ho-
dc.relation.code2019045117-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF ENGINEERING[S]-
dc.sector.departmentDEPARTMENT OF NUCLEAR ENGINEERING-
dc.identifier.pidychung-


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE