412 416

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author상병인-
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-27T07:57:29Z-
dc.date.available2019-05-27T07:57:29Z-
dc.date.issued2019-03-
dc.identifier.citationAPPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, v. 9, Issue 2, NO.229en_US
dc.identifier.issn2076-3417-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/9/2/229-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.hanyang.ac.kr/handle/20.500.11754/106034-
dc.description.abstractTo prevent biofouling from occurring in the cooling systems of coastal power plants, chlorine is often added to the cooling water. In this study, we have evaluated the fate of the total residual oxidants and the formation of inorganic chlorination byproducts including ClO3− and ClO4− during in situ electrochlorination with seawater. Then, the results were compared with those during direct OCl−-injection to seawater. The in situ electrochlorination method based on Ti/RuO2 electrodes produced much less ClO3−, while a similar level of total residual oxidants could be achieved with a reaction time of 5 min. Moreover, no ClO4− was observed, while the direct OCl−-injection system could still result in the production of ClO4−. The less or no production of ClO3− or ClO4− by the electrochlorination of seawater was mainly attributed to two reasons. First, during the electrolysis, the less amount of OCl− is available for ClO3− formation. Secondly, the formation of ClO3− or ClO4− is affected by the electrode material. In other words, if the electrode material is carefully chosen, the production of harmful reaction byproducts can be prevented or minimized. In short, based on the results from our study, electrochlorination technology proves to be a marine environmentally friendly method for controlling biofouling in the pipes of the cooling system in a coastal power plant.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) and the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea (No. 20171520101740).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.subjectseawater chlorinationen_US
dc.subjectelectrolysisen_US
dc.subjectchlorateen_US
dc.subjectperchlorateen_US
dc.subjectinorganic chlorination byproductsen_US
dc.titleComparison between OCl−-Injection and In Situ Electrochlorination in the Formation of Chlorate and Perchlorate in Seawateren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.no2-
dc.relation.volume9-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/app9020229-
dc.relation.page229-239-
dc.relation.journalAPPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYi, Jongchan-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAhn, Yongtae-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHong, Moongi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Gi-Hyeon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorShabnam, Nisha-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJeon, Byongsueng-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSang, Byoung-In-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Hyunook-
dc.relation.code2019038379-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF ENGINEERING[S]-
dc.sector.departmentDEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING-
dc.identifier.pidbiosang-


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE