271 0

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author노영석-
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-14T10:49:45Z-
dc.date.available2018-04-14T10:49:45Z-
dc.date.issued2011-11-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Dermatology, 2011, 21(6), P.959-965en_US
dc.identifier.issn1167-1122-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.jle.com/fr/revues/ejd/e-docs/a_double_blind_randomized_controlled_comparison_of_apddr_0901_a_novel_cosmeceutical_formulation_and_0.1_adapalene_gel_in_the_treatment_of_mild_to_moderate_acne_vulgaris_291025/article.phtml-
dc.description.abstractTopical retinoids have been widely used in the treatment of acne. They comprise several products used as prescription drugs as well as cosmeceuticals. Of these products, retinol has better tolerability compared with prescription retinoids such as tretinoin, but it is only used in cosmeceuticals due to its low biologic activity. A combination formulation could be an effective alternative to address the problem of decreased therapeutic activity. Recently, hexamidine diisethionate is known to have antibacterial activity, and rose extract has been shown to possess anti-inflammatory activity. In this study, we compared the efficacy and safety of the combination product APDDR-0901 (0.03% retinol, 0.7% rose extract, and 0.05% hexamidine diisethionate) vs 0.1% adapalene gel for the treatment of mild-to-moderate acne. This 12-week, multicenter, double-blinded study included 97 patients with mild-to-moderate acne. Efficacy was evaluated using 4 discrete variables: lesion count, acne grade, physician-assessed global improvement, and patient self-assessment. We also assessed safety profiles, including cutaneous irritation. Both APDDR-0901 and adapalene showed significant improvements without significant differences. Otherwise, the APDDR-0901 group showed better safety profiles, particularly in the first 2 weeks. In conclusion, APDDR-0901 could be an effective and safe alternative in the treatment of mild-to-moderate acne.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFinancial support: This study was funded by AmorePacific Corporation. Conflicts of interest: none.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJohn Libbey Eurotext LTDen_US
dc.subjectacne vulgarisen_US
dc.subjectadapaleneen_US
dc.subjectcosmeceuticalen_US
dc.subjectretinolen_US
dc.subjecthexamidine diisethionateen_US
dc.subjectrose extracten_US
dc.titleA double-blind randomized controlled comparison of APDDR-0901, a novel cosmeceutical formulation, and 0.1% adapalene gel in the treatment of mild-to-moderate acne vulgarisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.no6-
dc.relation.volume21-
dc.identifier.doi10.1684/ejd.2011.1546-
dc.relation.page959-965-
dc.relation.journalEuropean Journal of Dermatology-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, H.E.-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKo, J.Y.-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Y.H.-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoo, S.R.-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMoon, S.H.-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, N.I.-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, C.-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, J.H.-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKoh, H.J.-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, W.S.-
dc.relation.code2011203006-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S]-
dc.sector.departmentDEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE-
dc.identifier.pidromio-
Appears in Collections:
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S](의과대학) > MEDICINE(의학과) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE