210 0

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author최홍용-
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-14T04:32:44Z-
dc.date.available2018-04-14T04:32:44Z-
dc.date.issued2011-01-
dc.identifier.citationIn: Urology. (Urology, January 2011, 77(1):177-182)en_US
dc.identifier.issn0090-4295-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090429510006618?via%3Dihub-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11754/66003-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES To evaluate the surgical outcome in, and satisfaction with treatment of, patients undergoing epididymectomy for postvasectomy pain syndrome. METHODS A total of 49 patients were included. All participants had undergone epididymectomy for chronic epididymal pain from January 2000 to June 2009. Of the 49 patients, 4 had undergone bilateral epididymectomy, and the total number of procedures was 53: 18 in patients with postvasectomy pain syndrome (group 1, n = 16), 21 in patients with chronic epididymitis and no history of vasectomy (group 2, n = 19), and 14 in patients with an epididymal cyst and no history of vasectomy (group 3, n = 14). The preoperative and postoperative pain scale scores and surgical outcome were analyzed. RESULTS For the total patient sample, the mean age was 52.91 +/- 13.51 years, and the mean body mass index was 24.10 +/- 3.22 kg/m(2). The mean duration of pain was 1.3 years (range 0.25-20), and the mean duration of postoperative follow-up was 4.2 years (range 0.05-10.25). The mean preoperative pain score was 6.91 +/- 0.97. The mean postoperative pain scale score was 1.92 +/- 1.54 (P < .01). Statistically significant differences in the preoperative and postoperative pain scores were found for each group: group 1, 5.38 +/- 1.47 (range 3-8); group 2, 4.10 +/- 1.41 (range 2-6), and group 3, 5.21 +/- 1.88 (range 2-8; P = .004). In group 1, excellent surgical outcomes and high patient satisfaction were reported for 94.5% (17 of 18) of the procedures performed. CONCLUSIONS The results of our study have shown that epididymectomy is more effective in patients with a history of vasectomy than in those without. UROLOGY 77: 177-182, 2011. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisher[Belle Mead, NJ, etc.: Excerpta Medica, etc.] : Elsevier Science Ltd, c1973-.en_US
dc.subjectCHRONIC TESTICULAR PAINen_US
dc.subjectCHRONIC SCROTAL PAINen_US
dc.subjectPOSTVASECTOMY PAINen_US
dc.subjectSURGICAL-TREATMENTen_US
dc.subjectSPERMATIC CORDen_US
dc.subjectDENERVATIONen_US
dc.subjectMANAGEMENTen_US
dc.subjectPREVALENCEen_US
dc.subjectREVERSALen_US
dc.subjectOUTCOMESen_US
dc.titleEfficacy of Epididymectomy in Treatment of Chronic Epididymal Pain: A Comparison of Patients With and Without a History of Vasectomyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.no1-
dc.relation.volume77-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.urology.2010.05.009-
dc.relation.page177-182-
dc.relation.journalUROLOGY-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, J.Y.-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, T.Y.-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, H.Y.-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChoi, H.Y.-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoo, T.K.-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMoon, H.S.-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHan, J.H.-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, S.Y.-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, S.W.-
dc.relation.code2011209674-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S]-
dc.sector.departmentDEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE-
dc.identifier.pidqpqp-
Appears in Collections:
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S](의과대학) > MEDICINE(의학과) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE