270 0

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author하태경-
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T07:04:47Z-
dc.date.available2018-03-29T07:04:47Z-
dc.date.issued2014-11-
dc.identifier.citationAnnals of Surgical Treatment and Research(대한외과학회지), 2014, 87(5), P.223-231, 9P.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2288-6575-
dc.identifier.issn2288-6796-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.synapse.koreamed.org/search.php?where=aview&id=10.4174/astr.2014.87.5.223&code=6037ASTR&vmode=FULL-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11754/53758-
dc.description.abstractPurposeIt is well known that the curative resection with an adequate proximal margin length is the most effective treatment in gastric cancer. However, despite surgeon's effort to achieve a sufficient proximal margin length, it is often difficult to obtain a recommended proximal margin length in some cases. Therefore, this study was planned to investigate the impact of the length of proximal margin on prognosis of overall survival.MethodsBetween June 1992 and December 2010, 1,888 gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy with curative intent were reviewed. According to tumor's location (total vs. subtotal gastrectomy), pathologic T staging, and differentiation, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of the discrepancies of proximal margin length on overall survival. Also, the impact of the discrepancies of proximal margin length on local recurrence was assessed.ResultsThe 5-year survival rate of positive proximal margin group was 5.9%. In negative proximal margin groups, multivariate analysis showed that the discrepancies of proximal margin length have no impact on overall survival. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that there is no association between discrepancy of proximal margin length and local recurrence.ConclusionIt takes effort to secure a negative proximal margin in the surgical treatment of gastric cancer because of the poor prognosis of positive proximal margin. In negative proximal margin patients, there's no need to achieve an additional proximal margin length for long-term survival benefit because there was no impact of proximal margin length on overall survival and local recurrence.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisher대한외과학회en_US
dc.subjectGastric canceren_US
dc.subjectProximal margin lengthen_US
dc.subjectOverall survivalen_US
dc.subjectLocal recurrenceen_US
dc.titleThe distance of proximal resection margin dose not significantly influence on the prognosis of gastric cancer patients after curative resectionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.no5-
dc.relation.volume87-
dc.identifier.doi10.4174/astr.2014.87.5.223-
dc.relation.page223-231-
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SURGICAL SOCIETY-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Min-Gyu-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Ju-Hee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHa, Tae Kyung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKwon, Sung-Joon-
dc.relation.code2014034860-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S]-
dc.sector.departmentDEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE-
dc.identifier.pidmissurgeon-
Appears in Collections:
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S](의과대학) > MEDICINE(의학과) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE