208 0

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author김상헌-
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-15T05:29:25Z-
dc.date.available2018-03-15T05:29:25Z-
dc.date.issued2014-08-
dc.identifier.citationRESPIROLOGY, 2014, 19(6), p.852-856en_US
dc.identifier.issn1323-7799-
dc.identifier.issn1440-1843-
dc.identifier.urihttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/resp.12334/abstract-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11754/47131-
dc.description.abstractBackground and objective: Airway hyperresponsiveness is a common feature of asthma. Methacholine and mannitol are two representative agonists for bronchial challenge. They have theoretically different mechanisms of action, and may have different diagnostic properties. However, their difference has not been directly evaluated among Korean adults. In this study, we compare the diagnostic properties of methacholine and mannitol bronchial provocation tests.Methods: Asthmatic patients and non-asthmatic controls were recruited prospectively from four referral hospitals in Korea. Participants were challenged with each of methacholine and mannitol inhalation on different days. Their diagnostic utility was evaluated by calculating their sensitivity and specificity for asthma diagnosis. Response-dose ratio was also compared.Results: A total of 50 asthmatic adults and 54 controls were enrolled (mean age 43.8 years). The sensitivity and specificity of mannitol challenge (defined by a PD15 of <635 mg) were 48.0% and 92.6%, respectively, whereas those of methacholine (defined by a PC20 of <16 mg/mL) were 42.0% and 98.1%, respectively. Twenty asthmatic participants (24%) showed positive response to a single agonist only. In the receiver operating curve analyses using response-dose ratio values, area under the curve was 0.77 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68-0.86) for mannitol, and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.83-0.95) for methacholine. The correlations between log-transformed mannitol and methacholine response-dose ratios were significant but moderate (r = 0.683, P < 0.001).Conclusions: The present study demonstrated overall similar diagnostic properties of two diagnostic tests, but also suggested their intercomplementary roles for asthma.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipConflict of interest statement: This study was funded by BL&H Co., Ltd. Aridol (TM). Mannitol was provided by BL&H Co., Ltd., South Korea. BL&H had no influence on data interpretation or writing the manuscript.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWILEY-BLACKWELLen_US
dc.subjectbronchial provocation testen_US
dc.subjectmannitolen_US
dc.subjectmethacholineen_US
dc.subjectsensitivityen_US
dc.subjectspecificityen_US
dc.subjectAIRWAY HYPERRESPONSIVENESSen_US
dc.subjectCLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCEen_US
dc.subjectEXERCISE CHALLENGEen_US
dc.subjectASTHMATIC-PATIENTSen_US
dc.subjectINFLAMMATIONen_US
dc.subjectMARKERSen_US
dc.titleDiagnostic properties of the methacholine and mannitol bronchial challenge tests: A comparison studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.no6-
dc.relation.volume19-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/resp.12334-
dc.relation.page852-856-
dc.relation.journalRESPIROLOGY-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Min-Hye-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSong, Woo-Jung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Tae-Wan-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJin, Hyun-Jung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSin, You-Seob-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYe, Young-Min-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Sang-Heon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, Heung-Woo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Byung-Jae-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, Hae-Sim-
dc.relation.code2014038675-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S]-
dc.sector.departmentDEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE-
dc.identifier.pidsangheonkim-
Appears in Collections:
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S](의과대학) > MEDICINE(의학과) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE