252 0

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author김차동-
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-13T07:54:53Z-
dc.date.available2018-03-13T07:54:53Z-
dc.date.issued2014-05-
dc.identifier.citation경쟁법연구, 2014, 29, pp.359 - 400en_US
dc.identifier.issn1598-2335-
dc.identifier.urihttp://kiss.kstudy.com/thesis/thesis-view.asp?key=3251956-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11754/46201-
dc.description.abstractUnder the Korean antitrust jurisdiction, the administrative fine by the Korean Fair Trade Commission(hereinafter, “KFTC”) has played a major role on deterring the violations of antitrust laws. But, the average amount of fine was imposed as a very lower level as 1.4% of the affected commerce. It is estimated not to have a sufficient deterrence effect. Except for this fine, there are two more other sanctions such as criminal fines and damages, which have no sufficient deterrence effects at all. To reform the structure of Korean antitrust enforcement against the antitrust violations, two tracks may be offered. Firstly, some insist on raising the amount of administrative fine. Secondly, others insist on the introduction of class action and/or punitive damages systems. After reviewing all the strength and drawbacks of two way reforms, I can say that there is no royal way to get rid of all prospected drawbacks, and only ‘second best solution’ may be offered. Under the reform, enforcement costs.en_US
dc.language.isoko_KRen_US
dc.publisher한국경제법학회en_US
dc.subject실증연구en_US
dc.subject공정거래법위반행위en_US
dc.subject사적집행en_US
dc.subject공적집행en_US
dc.subject최대집행en_US
dc.subject최적집행en_US
dc.subject적발가능성en_US
dc.subject집단소송en_US
dc.subject징벌적손해배상en_US
dc.subjectempirical studyen_US
dc.subjectantitrust violiationen_US
dc.subjectprivate enforcemenen_US
dc.subjectpublic enforcementen_US
dc.subjectmaximum enforcementen_US
dc.subjectoptimal enforcementen_US
dc.subjectprobability of detectionen_US
dc.subjectclass actionen_US
dc.subjectpunitive damagesen_US
dc.title집단소송제 및 징벌적 손해배상제도 도입시 증가될 것으로 예상되는 공정거래법 위반행위 억지효과에 관한 실증적 분석en_US
dc.title.alternativeAn empirical study on the deterrence effects of the class action or punitive damages currently proposeden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.no제2호-
dc.relation.volume제29권-
dc.relation.page20-50-
dc.relation.journal경쟁법연구-
dc.contributor.googleauthor김차동-
dc.contributor.googleauthorkim, Chadong-
dc.relation.code2014000602-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakSCHOOL OF LAW[S]-
dc.sector.departmentHanyang University Law School-
dc.identifier.pidkjd1206-
Appears in Collections:
SCHOOL OF LAW[S](법학전문대학원) > Hanyang University Law School(법학전문대학원) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE