247 0

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author김상헌-
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-09T08:11:53Z-
dc.date.available2018-03-09T08:11:53Z-
dc.date.issued2013-10-
dc.identifier.citationRespiratory Medicine, 2013, 107(10), P.1509-1514en_US
dc.identifier.issn0954-6111-
dc.identifier.issn1532-3064-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ac.els-cdn.com/S0954611113002692/1-s2.0-S0954611113002692-main.pdf?_tid=653d805a-be48-47d6-bab6-61b595aa88aa&acdnat=1520499930_7d8e551d3f0ec1f42d1ee67a7b24353d-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11754/44461-
dc.description.abstractBackground: There has been no large-scale and comprehensive study of the differences between asthma in elderly asthmatics (EA) and non-elderly (i.e. young) asthmatics (NEA).Methods: We performed principal component analysis (PCA) using 2067 asthmatics (434 EA and 1633 NEA) from the Korean Cohort for Reality and Evolution of adult Asthma (COREA). EA was defined as asthmatics with the chronological age of 65 or more and eleven clinical variables measured at enrollment were used for PCA; symptom score, symptom duration, number of exacerbation during previous one year, smoking pack year, number of controller medications, body mass index, predicted % of FEV1, predicted % FVC, post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio, atopy index and number of eosinophils in peripheral blood.Results: PCA of all asthmatics showed that EA and NEA were distinctly separated by the first and second principal component on the plot of individual asthmatics according to their scores. For further analysis, we divided all asthmatics into the EA and the NEA group and performed PCA again in each group. The first four principal components with eigenvalues >= 1.0 were identified in both groups and they explained 55.5% of the variance in the EA group and 52.4% in the NEA group respectively. Clinical variables showed distinctly different patterns of loading on the first four principal components between the EA and the NEA group.Conclusion: EA and NEA have different compositional patterns underlying their clinical variables. These observations helped in understanding the differences between EA and NEA from the integrated view covering various clinical aspects. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by grants of the Korean Health 21 R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant no. A040153 and A070001).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherW B SAUNDERS CO LTD, 32 JAMESTOWN RD, LONDON NW1 7BY, ENGLANDen_US
dc.subjectAsthmaen_US
dc.subjectElderlyen_US
dc.subjectCharacteristicsen_US
dc.subjectPrincipal components analysisen_US
dc.subjectSEVERITYen_US
dc.subjectOBESITYen_US
dc.subjectAGEen_US
dc.subjectSENSITIZATIONen_US
dc.subjectASSOCIATIONen_US
dc.subjectMANAGEMENTen_US
dc.subjectDISEASEen_US
dc.subjectCOHORTen_US
dc.subjectADULTSen_US
dc.subjectOLDERen_US
dc.titleDifferences between asthma in young and elderly: Results from the COREA studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.no10-
dc.relation.volume107-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rmed.2013.07.016-
dc.relation.page1509-1514-
dc.relation.journalRESPIRATORY MEDICINE-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, Heung-Woo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKwon, Hyouk-Soo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Tae-Bum-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Sang-Heon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChang, Yoon-Seok-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJang, An-Soo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorCho, You-Sook-
dc.contributor.googleauthorNahm, Dong-Ho-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, Jung-Won-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoon, Ho-Joo-
dc.relation.code2013011915-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S]-
dc.sector.departmentDEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE-
dc.identifier.pidsangheonkim-
Appears in Collections:
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S](의과대학) > MEDICINE(의학과) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE