Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 박찬혁 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-12-15T02:13:45Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-12-15T02:13:45Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016-02 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, v. 23, NO 2, Page. 539-545 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1068-9265 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1534-4681 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1245%2Fs10434-015-4866-8 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11754/34152 | - |
dc.description.abstract | For patients who undergo gastrectomy for gastric cancer, systematic follow-up evaluation to detect recurrent lesions is recommended, although the benefits of a surveillance program using short-term imaging studies have not been evaluated. This study reviewed the clinical data of patients who underwent curative surgery for gastric cancer using a prospective database. Patients with recurrence were classified according to surveillance interval as follows: a parts per thousand currency sign3, 3-6, and 6-12 months. Of the 2785 patients who underwent curative surgery for gastric cancer, 376 (13.5 %) had intraabdominal recurrences, excluding the stomach. Multivariable analysis showed that a short surveillance interval did not increase the post-recurrence survival duration (with 6-12 months as the reference: a parts per thousand currency sign3 months: hazard ratio [HR] 0.954; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.689-1.323; 3-6 months: HR 0.994, 95 % CI 0.743-1.330). In addition, short surveillance intervals did not increase overall survival (with 6-12 months as the reference: a parts per thousand currency sign3 months: HR 0.969; 95 % CI 0.699-1.342; 3-6 months: HR 0.955; 95 % CI 0.711-1.285). In contrast to the surveillance interval, age, cancer stage, symptoms at recurrence, and recurrence time after gastrectomy were factors associated with both post-recurrence survival and overall survival. Although the detection of recurrence before symptoms helped to prolong both post-recurrence survival and overall survival, shortening the surveillance interval to less than 6 months did not improve either the patient's post-recurrence survival or overall survival. Hence, it is not recommended that asymptomatic patients undergo surveillance involving imaging studies more often than once a year. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | SPRINGER | en_US |
dc.subject | LAPAROSCOPY-ASSISTED GASTRECTOMY | en_US |
dc.subject | FOLLOW-UP | en_US |
dc.subject | COLORECTAL-CANCER | en_US |
dc.subject | ASYMPTOMATIC RECURRENCE | en_US |
dc.subject | RETROSPECTIVE COHORT | en_US |
dc.subject | RESECTION | en_US |
dc.subject | METAANALYSIS | en_US |
dc.title | Impact of the Surveillance Interval on the Survival of Patients Who Undergo Curative Surgery for Gastric Cancer | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.relation.no | 2 | - |
dc.relation.volume | 23 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1245/s10434-015-4866-8 | - |
dc.relation.page | 539-545 | - |
dc.relation.journal | ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Park, Chan Hyuk | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Park, Jun Chul | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Chung, Hyunsoo | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Shin, Sung Kwan | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Lee, Sang Kil | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Cheong, Jae-Ho | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Hyung, Woo Jin | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Lee, Yong Chan | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Noh, Sung Hoon | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Kim, Choong Bae | - |
dc.relation.code | 2016003224 | - |
dc.sector.campus | S | - |
dc.sector.daehak | COLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S] | - |
dc.sector.department | DEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE | - |
dc.identifier.pid | chan100 | - |
dc.identifier.researcherID | I-1794-2016 | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3824-3481 | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.