151 76

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author이수진-
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-11T00:15:05Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-11T00:15:05Z-
dc.date.issued2020-09-
dc.identifier.citationSCIENTIFIC REPORTS, v. 10, no. 1, article no. 14864en_US
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-71445-5-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.hanyang.ac.kr/handle/20.500.11754/170739-
dc.description.abstractFunctional imaging modalities enable practitioners to identify functional lung regions. This analysis evaluated the feasibility of nuclear medicine imaging to avoid doses to the functional lung in radiotherapy (RT) planning for patients with lung cancer. This systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out according to PRISMA-P guidelines. A search of EMBASE and PubMed for studies published throughout the last 20 years was performed using the following search criteria: (a) 'lung cancer' or 'lung malignancy' and (b) 'radiotherapy' or 'radiation therapy' or 'RT planning' and (c) 'SPECT' or 'single positron emission computed tomography' or 'functional image.' The analyzed planning parameters were the volumes of the normal lung that have received >= 10 Gy and >= 20 Gy of radiation (V10 and V20, respectively) and the mean lung dose (MLD). We compared the planning parameters obtained from anatomical RT planning and functional RT planning using perfusion or ventilation imaging ('V10, V20 or MLD' in anatomical plan vs. 'fV10, fV20 or fMLD' in functional plan). A total of 309 patients with 344 RT plan sets from 15 publications (11 perfusion SPECT, 2 ventilation SPECT, and 1 SPECT and 1 PET with both perfusion and ventilation) were included in the meta-analysis. The standard mean differences in planning parameters in functional plans using nuclear imaging were significantly reduced compared to those of anatomical plans (P<0.01 for all): -0.42 (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.78 to -0.07) for 'V10 vs. fV10 ', -0.41 (95% CI -0.64 to -0.17) for 'V20 vs. fV20 ', and -0.24 (95% CI -0.45 to -0.03) for 'MLD vs. fMLD'. In subgroup analysis, the functional plan using perfusion was significantly lower than the anatomical plan in all planning parameters, but there was no significant difference for ventilation. RT planning with nuclear functional lung imaging has potential to reduce radiation-induced lung injury. Perfusion imaging seems to be more promising than ventilation imaging for all planning parameters. There were not enough studies using ventilation imaging to determine what the effect is on the lung plan parameters.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was carried out with the support of the research fund of Hanyang University (HY-2018).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNATURE PUBLISHING GROUPen_US
dc.subjectINTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPYen_US
dc.subjectRADIATION-THERAPYen_US
dc.subjectPULMONARY VENTILATIONen_US
dc.subjectPERFUSION SCANSen_US
dc.subjectAVOIDANCEen_US
dc.subjectPARAMETERSen_US
dc.subjectTECHNEGASen_US
dc.subjectTOXICITYen_US
dc.subjectUTILITYen_US
dc.subjectALLOWSen_US
dc.titleSingle photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or positron emission tomography (PET) imaging for radiotherapy planning in patients with lung cancer: a meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41598-020-71445-5-
dc.relation.journalSCIENTIFIC REPORTS-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Soo Jin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, Hae Jin-
dc.relation.code2020051242-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S]-
dc.sector.departmentDEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE-
dc.identifier.pidleesoojin-
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5600-1315-


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE