256 0

Extension of tunneling quality index and rock mass rating systems for tunnel support design through back calculations in highly stressed jointed rock mass: An empirical approach based on tunneling data from Himalaya

Title
Extension of tunneling quality index and rock mass rating systems for tunnel support design through back calculations in highly stressed jointed rock mass: An empirical approach based on tunneling data from Himalaya
Author
유한규
Keywords
High in-situ stresses; Jointed rock mass; SRF; Stress adjustment factor; Back calculation
Issue Date
2019-03
Publisher
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
Citation
TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, v. 85, Page. 29-42
Abstract
A preliminary support design is the basic output of an empirical rock mass classification system. Tunneling quality index (Q) and rock mass rating (RMR) systems are used specifically for tunnel support in moderately jointed and massive rocks; however, they do not provide any information/guidance for jointed rock masses in a highly stressed environment. Hence, this study focuses on the already supported drill and blast tunnel sections mapping data of four tunneling projects in Pakistan. The study extends the application of these systems to the tunnel support design for highly stressed jointed rock mass through an empirical approach. In each empirical approach, the parameters for the stress condition are suggested. Rock mass quality (Q or Q(c)) is determined from back calculations using an installed support and tunnel span. Empirical equations and charts are proposed for the stress reduction factor (SRF) characterization. In the proposed equations and charts, the SRF is a function of intact rock strength, relative block size, and strength stress ratio. In the case of the RMR system, approximately 90% of the sections show that the actual supports are heavier than the suggested supports by RMFt(89). The RMR was determined from the installed support for each tunnel section through the back calculations. To select the adjustment rating factor for stress, three hypotheses are considered based on the intact rock strength to the major principal stress ratio. The RMR14 suggested support revealed that all sections are heavily supported. A strong correlation exists between RMR89 and RMR14. Three hypotheses are considered for the stress adjustment factor rating selection for RMR14 based on the correlation equation between RMFt(89) and RMR14. For the evaluation, the application of modified Q and RMR systems are used in the tunnel support in a case study. The exploration reports show that the tunnel will pass through a jointed rock mass under high in-situ stress environments. The comparison shows that heavy support is recommended from the modified systems for tunnel stability.
URI
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886779817311896https://repository.hanyang.ac.kr/handle/20.500.11754/121689
ISSN
0886-7798
DOI
10.1016/j.tust.2018.11.050
Appears in Collections:
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES[E](공학대학) > CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING(건설환경공학과) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE