163 0

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChun Ki Kim-
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-07T21:25:05Z-
dc.date.available2019-12-07T21:25:05Z-
dc.date.issued2018-04-
dc.identifier.citationANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, v. 32, no. 3, page. 165-174en_US
dc.identifier.issn0914-7187-
dc.identifier.issn1864-6433-
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12149-018-1229-0-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.hanyang.ac.kr/handle/20.500.11754/118498-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this prospective pilot study was to investigate the potential of serial FLT-PET/CT compared to FDG-PET/CT to provide an early indication of esophageal cancer response to concurrent neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy.Five patients with biopsy-proven esophageal adenocarcinomas underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation (Tx) prior to minimally invasive esophagectomy. The presence of residual tumor was classified histologically using the Mandard et al. criteria, categorizing patients as pathologic responders and non-responders. Participants underwent PET/CT imaging 1 h after intravenous administration of FDG and of FLT on two separate days within 48 h of each other. Each patient underwent a total of 3 scan "pairs": (1) pre-treatment, (2) during treatment, and (3) post-treatment. Image-based response to therapy was measured in terms of changes in SUVmax (Delta SUV) between pre- and post-therapeutic FLT- and FDG-PET scans. The PET imaging findings were correlated with the pathology results after surgery.All tumors were FDG and FLT avid at baseline. Lesion FLT uptake was lower than with FDG. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation resulted in a reduction of tumor uptake of both radiotracers in pathological responders (n = 3) and non-responders (n = 2). While the difference in the reduction in mean tumor FLT uptake during Tx between responders (Delta SUV = - 55%) and non-responders (Delta SUV = - 29%) was significant (P = 0.007), for FDG it was not, [responders had a mean Delta SUV = - 39 vs. - 31% for non-responders (P = 0.74)]. The difference in the reduction in tumor FLT uptake at the end of treatment between responders (Delta SUV = - 62%) and non-responders (Delta SUV = - 57%) was not significant (P = 0.54), while for FDG there was a trend toward significance [Delta SUV of responders = - 74 vs. - 52% in non-responders (P = 0.06)].The results of this prospective pilot study suggest that early changes in tumor FLT uptake may be better than FDG in predicting response of esophageal adenocarcinomas to neoadjuvant chemoradiation. These preliminary results support the need to corroborate the value of FLT-PET/CT in a larger cohort.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipTechnology and Innovation Grant from the Kaye Scholar Award at Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSPRINGERen_US
dc.subjectFDGen_US
dc.subjectFLTen_US
dc.subjectPET/CTen_US
dc.subjectEsophageal canceren_US
dc.subjectRadiation therapyen_US
dc.subjectResponse to treatmenten_US
dc.subjectNeoadjuvant chemoradiotherapyen_US
dc.titlePilot study of serial FLT and FDG-PET/CT imaging to monitor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy of esophageal adenocarcinoma: correlation with histopathologic responseen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.no3-
dc.relation.volume32-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12149-018-1229-0-
dc.relation.page165-174-
dc.relation.journalANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGerbaudo, Victor H.-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKilloran, Joseph H.-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Chun K.-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHornick, Jason L.-
dc.contributor.googleauthorNowak, Jonathan A.-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEnzinger, Peter C.-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMamon, Harvey J.-
dc.relation.code2018006033-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S]-
dc.sector.departmentDEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE-
dc.identifier.pidchunkikim-
Appears in Collections:
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S](의과대학) > MEDICINE(의학과) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE