260 0

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author유대현-
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-26T07:16:57Z-
dc.date.available2019-11-26T07:16:57Z-
dc.date.issued2017-07-
dc.identifier.citationLANCET, v. 390, no. 10093, page. 457-468en_US
dc.identifier.issn0140-6736-
dc.identifier.issn1474-547X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(17)31618-5/fulltext-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.hanyang.ac.kr/handle/20.500.11754/114744-
dc.description.abstractBackground Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. The Oral Rheumatoid Arthritis triaL (ORAL) Strategy aimed to assess the comparative efficacy of tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib plus methotrexate, and adalimumab plus methotrexate for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in patients with a previous inadequate response to methotrexate. Methods ORAL Strategy was a 1 year, double-blind, phase 3b/4, head-to-head, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial in patients aged 18 years or older with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1: 1: 1) to receive oral tofacitinib (5 mg twice daily) monotherapy, oral tofacitinib (5 mg twice daily) plus methotrexate, or subcutaneous adalimumab (40 mg every other week) plus methotrexate at 194 centres in 25 countries. Eligible patients received live zoster vaccine at investigators' discretion. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who attained an American College of Rheumatology response of at least 50% (ACR50) at month 6 in the full analysis set (patients who were randomly assigned to a group and received at least one dose of the study treatment). Non-inferiority between groups was shown if the lower bound of the 98.34% CI of the difference between comparators was larger than -13.0%. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02187055. Findings 1146 patients received treatment (384 had tofacitinib monotherapy; 376 had tofacitinib and methotrexate; and 386 had adalimumab and methotrexate). At 6 months, ACR50 response was attained in 147 (38%) of 384 patients with tofacitinib monotherapy, 173 (46%) of 376 patients with tofacitinib and methotrexate, and 169 (44%) of 386 patients with adalimumab and methotrexate. Non-inferiority was declared for tofacitinib and methotrexate versus adalimumab and methotrexate (difference 2% [98.34% CI -6 to 11]) but not for tofacitinib monotherapy versus either adalimumab and methotrexate (-6 [-14 to 3]) or tofacitinib and methotrexate (-8 [-16 to 1]). In total, 23 (6%) of 384 patients receiving tofacitinib monotherapy, 26 (7%) of 376 patients receiving tofacitinib plus methotrexate, and 36 (9%) of 386 patients receiving adalimumab plus methotrexate discontinued due to adverse events. Two (1%) of the 384 patients receiving tofacitinib monotherapy died. No new or unexpected safety issues were reported for either treatment in this study for up to 1 year. Interpretation Tofacitinib and methotrexate combination therapy was non-inferior to adalimumab and methotrexate combination therapy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in patients with an inadequate response to methotrexate in this trial. Tofacitinib monotherapy was not shown to be non-inferior to either combination.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was sponsored by Pfizer Inc. Medical writing support, underdirection from the authors, was provided by Martin Bell, of CompleteMedical Communications, and was funded by Pfizer Inc.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INCen_US
dc.subjectMODIFYING ANTIRHEUMATIC DRUGSen_US
dc.subjectJANUS KINASE INHIBITORen_US
dc.subjectLONG-TERM SAFETYen_US
dc.subjectINADEQUATE RESPONSEen_US
dc.subjectPLUS METHOTREXATEen_US
dc.subjectAMERICAN-COLLEGEen_US
dc.subjectNECROSIS-FACTORen_US
dc.subjectOPEN-LABELen_US
dc.subjectCOMBINATIONen_US
dc.subjectPLACEBOen_US
dc.titleEfficacy and safety of tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib with methotrexate, and adalimumab with methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (ORAL Strategy): a phase 3b/4, double-blind, head-to-head, randomised controlled trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.no10093-
dc.relation.volume390-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31618-5-
dc.relation.page457-468-
dc.relation.journalLANCET-
dc.contributor.googleauthorFleischmann, Roy-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMysler, Eduardo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHall, Stephen-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKivitz, Alan J.-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMoots, Robert J.-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLuo, Zhen-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDeMasi, Ryan-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSoma, Koshika-
dc.contributor.googleauthorZhang, Richard-
dc.contributor.googleauthorTakiya, Liza-
dc.relation.code2017002401-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S]-
dc.sector.departmentDEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE-
dc.identifier.piddhyoo-
Appears in Collections:
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S](의과대학) > MEDICINE(의학과) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE