306 0

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author박성욱-
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-22T01:01:11Z-
dc.date.available2019-11-22T01:01:11Z-
dc.date.issued2017-03-
dc.identifier.citationAPPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, v. 121, page. 595-603en_US
dc.identifier.issn1359-4311-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359431117300728?via%3Dihub-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.hanyang.ac.kr/handle/20.500.11754/113394-
dc.description.abstractIn the present study, the volumetric efficiency and combustion characteristics of compressed natural gas (CNG) direct injection (DI) and port fuel injection (PFI) were compared. In a single-cylinder engine, various fuel injection timings were tested for each fuel injection position, and the volumetric efficiency of each test condition was calculated from the intake flow rate. The one-dimensional simulation program AMESim was also used to further investigate the intake process. Experimental and numerical results showed that the volumetric efficiency was not influenced by the position of the injector. For the early fuel injection, before the intake valve close (IVC), the volumetric efficiencies of the DI and PFI were similar to each other; the averaged volumetric efficiencies were both about 38.62% and the standard deviations of volumetric efficiency were less than 0.2%. However, as the fuel injection timing was retarded after the IVC, the volumetric efficiency of DI increased while the volumetric efficiency of PFI was kept constant or slightly decreased. The increase in the volumetric efficiency was due to the fact that the fuel volume did not occupy the cylinder volume during the intake stroke. Combustion was stable for all the test conditions. The coefficient of variation of the indicated mean effective pressure (COVIMEP) was lower than 1.5%. The highest fuel conversion efficiency was observed for late fuel direct injection, after the IVC, due to the fastest combustion. Thus, by applying the late fuel injection timing after IVC, the CNG-DI could have a higher volumetric efficiency and fuel conversion efficiency than the CNG-PFI. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (NRF-2016R1A1A1A05919795) and "Human Resources Program in Energy Technology" of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP), granted financial resource from the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy, Republic of Korea. (No. 20164010200860).en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherPERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTDen_US
dc.subjectDirect injectionen_US
dc.subjectPort fuel injectionen_US
dc.subjectVolumetric efficiencyen_US
dc.subjectFuel conversion efficiencyen_US
dc.subjectCompressed Natural Gas (CNG)en_US
dc.subjectAMESimen_US
dc.titleComparisons of the volumetric efficiency and combustion characteristics between CNG-DI and CNG-PFI enginesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.volume121-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.04.110-
dc.relation.page595-603-
dc.relation.journalAPPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSong, Jingeun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChoi, Minhu-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, Sungwook-
dc.relation.code2017004014-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF ENGINEERING[S]-
dc.sector.departmentDIVISION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING-
dc.identifier.pidparks-
Appears in Collections:
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING[S](공과대학) > MECHANICAL ENGINEERING(기계공학부) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE