138 0

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author구혜령-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-26T07:22:41Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-26T07:22:41Z-
dc.date.issued2016-06-
dc.identifier.citationOTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, v. 154, NO 6, Page. 1005-1013en_US
dc.identifier.issn0194-5998-
dc.identifier.issn1097-6817-
dc.identifier.urihttp://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0194599816638084-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.hanyang.ac.kr/handle/20.500.11754/73154-
dc.description.abstractObjective To compare the surgical outcomes of robotic selective neck dissection (SND) with total thyroidectomy and conventional transcervical SND with total thyroidectomy. Study Design Case series with chart review. Setting University tertiary care facility. Subject and Methods We retrospectively analyzed 66 patients who underwent total thyroidectomy with SND (3 levels of II-V) and bilateral central neck dissection for cN1b papillary thyroid carcinoma, of whom 41 underwent conventional SND and 25 of whom underwent robotic SND. Subjective pain, sensory change, and cosmetic satisfaction were evaluated regularly for 3 months with a questionnaire. Results Compared with the conventional group, patients in the robotic group were younger (mean, 36.7 vs 47.5 years; P = .003) and more female dominant (96.0% vs 73.2%; P = .023). Mean total operative time was longer in the robotic group than the conventional group (298 vs 236 minutes; P < .001). Anterior chest pain was higher in the robotic group at postoperative 1 day (pain score, 1.88 vs 0.62; P = .011), 1 week (1.30 vs 0.43; P = .036), and 1 month (0.90 vs 0.18; P = .029). Postoperative cosmetic satisfaction was significantly superior in the robotic group. Conclusion Compared with conventional transcervical SND with total thyroidectomy, robotic SND with total thyroidectomy yields superior outcomes for cosmetic satisfaction, longer operative time, and higher chest pain in the short term. Further study with a larger number of patients is mandatory.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS LTDen_US
dc.subjectthyroid canceren_US
dc.subjectrobotic neck dissectionen_US
dc.subjectrobotic thyroidectomyen_US
dc.subjectselective neck dissectionen_US
dc.subjectlateral neck dissectionen_US
dc.titleComparison of Robotic versus Conventional Selective Neck Dissection and Total Thyroidectomy for Papillary Thyroid Carcinomaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.no6-
dc.relation.volume154-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0194599816638084-
dc.relation.page1005-1013-
dc.relation.journalOTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSong, Chang Myeon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJi, Yong Bae-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSung, Eui Suk-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Dong Sun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKoo, Hye Ryoung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorTae, Kyung-
dc.relation.code2016000478-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S]-
dc.sector.departmentDEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE-
dc.identifier.pidhuilings-
Appears in Collections:
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S](의과대학) > MEDICINE(의학과) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE