Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 최원배 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-04-26T08:16:42Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-04-26T08:16:42Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013-12 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 철학적 분석(Philosophical analysis), Vol.- No.28 [2013], 55-77(23쪽) | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1598-9275 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001830911 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.hanyang.ac.kr/handle/20.500.11754/70862 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Our notion of validity in classical logic seems to yield some unintuitive results, one of which is that known as EFQ, ex falso quodlibet. In this paper I examine Read’s solution to EFQ. Read argues that some rules of inference such as addition or disjunctive syllogism are not valid. I show that he does not succeed in establishing the invalidity of those rules. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | ko_KR | en_US |
dc.publisher | 한국분석철학회(The Korean Society of Analytic Philosopy) | en_US |
dc.subject | EFQ | en_US |
dc.subject | 선언 삼단논법 | en_US |
dc.subject | 선언 도입 | en_US |
dc.subject | 타당성 | en_US |
dc.subject | 리드 | en_US |
dc.subject | EFQ | en_US |
dc.subject | disjunctive syllogism | en_US |
dc.subject | disjunction introduction | en_US |
dc.subject | validity | en_US |
dc.subject | Read | en_US |
dc.title | 타당성, EFQ, 그리고 리드의 해결책 | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Validity, EFQ, and Read’s Solution | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.relation.no | 28 | - |
dc.relation.page | 55-77 | - |
dc.relation.journal | 철학적 분석 | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | 최원배 | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Choi, Wonbae | - |
dc.relation.code | 2012213953 | - |
dc.sector.campus | S | - |
dc.sector.daehak | COLLEGE OF POLICY SCIENCE[S] | - |
dc.sector.department | DEPARTMENT OF POLICY STUDIES | - |
dc.identifier.pid | choiwb | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.