Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 정동호 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-03-29T05:47:36Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-03-29T05:47:36Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013-11 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 가족법연구 2013, 27(3) 통권 48호 pp. 109-134 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1225-1224 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://scholar.dkyobobook.co.kr/searchDetail.laf?barcode=4010023640116 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11754/53680 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The Head of Family System and the concerned traditional custom/rules are very important in our ordinary family life and it's affected division. Notwithstanding the system was abolished, so called, by family scholars and governmental designations, in a sense, this amendment is really a transformation of our traditional family life itself. And the repeal is concerned not only civil law but also other laws, for example, penal law and civil process law etc. In the other points, family forms and their members are not so simple or inter-counted relatives. And the future family forms can not easily be expected. For example, the parent's family, children's family, or the confused family etc. can be really exposed. Their relations can not be easy to understand, consult and fax. This article is written about a part of the problems. The main points are as followings. 1) The base of the Head of Family System. 2) The transformation of the concerned provision. 3) The abolition of head-command family system. 4) The family life fusion after this abolition. The other legal problems should be deeply thought and written as the special Article. And so on I think that Korean Family Life style may not change and in some ways the more meaningful family life forms can be found. But I think we threw away a very important family system that anyone can not restore in other society or general country. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | ko_KR | en_US |
dc.publisher | 한국가족법학회 The Korean Society Of Family Law. | en_US |
dc.subject | 호주 | en_US |
dc.subject | 호주제도의 기능 | en_US |
dc.subject | 호주제도의 존폐론 | en_US |
dc.subject | 호주제도의 폐지과정 | en_US |
dc.subject | 호주제도 폐지 이후의 가족생활상 | en_US |
dc.subject | 노인문제 | en_US |
dc.subject | 가족의 해체 | en_US |
dc.subject | 기아문제 | en_US |
dc.subject | 이농상태의 증가 | en_US |
dc.subject | 꿈으로 키우는 민주가정 | en_US |
dc.subject | 되찾을 수 없는 호주제도 | en_US |
dc.subject | The Head of Family | en_US |
dc.subject | The Function of the Head of Family System | en_US |
dc.subject | The Discussion of Fusion of the Family System | en_US |
dc.subject | The Life Style after the Abolition of Family System | en_US |
dc.subject | The Problem of the Old Men | en_US |
dc.subject | Dismantlement of Family | en_US |
dc.subject | The Problem of on Abandoned Child | en_US |
dc.subject | The Problem of giving up Farming | en_US |
dc.subject | The Dreamed Democratic Family Style Divide with Relative | en_US |
dc.subject | The Family System Non-remarked Family System | en_US |
dc.title | 호주제도 폐지 이후의 가족생활의 변모 | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | The Negative Family Life Aspect after the Abolition of the Head of Family System | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.relation.no | 3 | - |
dc.relation.volume | 27 | - |
dc.relation.page | 109-134 | - |
dc.relation.journal | 가족법연구 | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | 정동호 | - |
dc.relation.code | 2012214342 | - |
dc.sector.campus | S | - |
dc.sector.daehak | SCHOOL OF LAW[S] | - |
dc.sector.department | Hanyang University Law School | - |
dc.identifier.pid | jdh1949 | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.