147 0

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author정진혁-
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-23T05:05:03Z-
dc.date.available2018-03-23T05:05:03Z-
dc.date.issued2014-05-
dc.identifier.citationOTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 권: 150, 호: 3, 페이지: 394-400en_US
dc.identifier.issn0194-5998-
dc.identifier.issn1097-6817-
dc.identifier.urihttp://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0194599813515431-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11754/51234-
dc.description.abstractObjectives The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of robot-assisted neck dissection by a postauricular facelift approach in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), compared with conventional neck dissection. Study Design Case series with chart review. Setting University tertiary care hospital. Subjects and Methods Thirty HNSCC patients with clinically node negative necks (cN0) who underwent robot-assisted selective neck dissection (SND) by a postauricular facelift approach (11 patients, 12 necks) or conventional neck dissection (19 patients, 21 necks). Results The mean age was lower in the robotic group (P = .030). However, the distributions of gender and TNM stage did not differ between the two groups. The robotic SND was completed successfully in all patients. The mean operative time was longer in the robotic group (215 +/- 56 min) than the conventional group (144 +/- 43 min) (P < .001). The mean numbers of lymph nodes removed were 25.0 +/- 7.4 and 28.9 +/- 8.2 in the robotic and conventional group, respectively (P = .192), and the number of lymph nodes removed at each level also did not differ between the 2 groups. In addition, there was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the 2 groups, but cosmetic satisfaction was higher in the robot group (P = .002). Conclusions Robot-assisted SND by a postauricular facelift approach is comparable to conventional neck dissection in selected patients with cN0 HNSCC and results in excellent postoperative cosmesis.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD, 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLANDen_US
dc.subjectrobotic neck dissectionen_US
dc.subjectfacelift approachen_US
dc.subjecthead and neck squamous cell carcinomaen_US
dc.subjectendoscopic neck surgeryen_US
dc.subjectscarless surgeryen_US
dc.titleRobotic Selective Neck Dissection by a Postauricular Facelift Approach Comparison with Conventional Neck Dissectionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.no3-
dc.relation.volume150-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0194599813515431-
dc.relation.page394-400-
dc.relation.journalOTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY-
dc.contributor.googleauthorTae, Kyung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJi, Yong Bae-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSong, Chang Myeon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJeong, Jin Hyeok-
dc.contributor.googleauthorCho, Seok Hyun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Seung Hwan-
dc.relation.code2014037168-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S]-
dc.sector.departmentDEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE-
dc.identifier.pident-
dc.identifier.researcherIDL-1362-2016-
Appears in Collections:
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S](의과대학) > ETC
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE