326 0

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author박수근-
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-09T05:51:26Z-
dc.date.available2018-03-09T05:51:26Z-
dc.date.issued2014-03-
dc.identifier.citation법학논총, 2014, 31(2), P.705-730en_US
dc.identifier.issn1225-228x-
dc.identifier.urihttp://kiss.kstudy.com/thesis/thesis-view.asp?key=3233844-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11754/44221-
dc.description.abstractThere is a political movement to extension of a voluntary part-time work for improvement of employment-population ratio by the government. Traditionally, a part-time work has been recognised as the transition way to get a full-time job or the method to balance job and family for working women. As times change, there are a lot of demand for finding a part-time work with various reasons. Nevertheless, the legislations related to employment and labour relations seem to presume that a general-type of an employee is a full-time worker. The anti-discrimination procedure for irregular workers has been introduced to resolve this problems since 2006 (there was not a lot in between). In these circumstances, this article trys to find a way for extension of a voluntary part-time worker in perspective on Labour Law. The article deals with two substantive matters, one is flexible work in employment and the other is the anti-discrimination procedure. There are two types of a part-time work, new hiring part-time work and the converted one from a full-time worker, and the latter could be in the true sense of a voluntary part-time work. To promote a part-time work and to realise work-family balance, the Equal Employment and Work-Family Balance Assistance Act(EWBA) provides a flexible working system. The problem is that there are a lot of ways to get around the regulations for employer and there is no method to guarantee the effectiveness of that. To make better use of the system, it should be changed when a full-time worker asks an employer to transpose into a part-time worker, the legal obligation of an employer should be established for consultation and agreement. Moreover, the boundaries of claim for a part-time work should be extended in a full-time employee who has to do family care. To improve the effectiveness of the anti-discrimination procedure for a part-time worker, the regulations about the prerequisite should be changed for the applicant and the comparator requirement to promote the claim as well as systematic changes to beef up professionalism to judge discrimination in employment. The limited right for equal treatment in the regulations does little to confront the problems. In order to bring about the genuine transformation of a part-time work, the focus should be on the protection of their rights.en_US
dc.description.sponsorship이 논문은 2011년도 정부(교육부)의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 연구되었음 (NRF-2011-327-B00774)en_US
dc.language.isoko_KRen_US
dc.publisher한양대학교 법학연구소en_US
dc.subject단시간근로en_US
dc.subject상용형 단시간en_US
dc.subject전환형 단시간en_US
dc.subject차별시정제도en_US
dc.title자발적 단시간근로 확대를 위한 법제도적 개선방안en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.page705-730-
dc.relation.journal법학논총-
dc.contributor.googleauthor김근주-
dc.contributor.googleauthor박수근-
dc.relation.code2014001674-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakSCHOOL OF LAW[S]-
dc.sector.departmentHanyang University Law School-
dc.identifier.pidsukeun-
Appears in Collections:
SCHOOL OF LAW[S](법학전문대학원) > Hanyang University Law School(법학전문대학원) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE