275 0

Autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus: comparison of historical and current assessment of seropositivity

Title
Autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus: comparison of historical and current assessment of seropositivity
Author
배상철
Keywords
ANA; autoantibodies; systemic lupus erythematosus; B-CELL DEPLETION; REVISED CRITERIA; ANTIBODY-TITERS; NEPHRITIS; CLASSIFICATION; FLUCTUATION; PROFILES; EFFICACY; THERAPY; SM
Issue Date
2011-05
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Citation
LUPUS, Vol.20 No.3 [2011], 250-255
Abstract
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is characterized by multiple autoantibodies and complement activation. Recent studies have suggested that anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) positivity may disappear over time in some SLE patients. Anti-double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibody titers and complement levels may vary with time and immunosuppressive treatment, while the behavior of anti-extractable nuclear antigen (ENA) over time is less well understood. This study sought to determine the correlation between historical autoantibody tests and current testing in patients with SLE. Three hundred and two SLE patients from the ACR Reclassification of SLE (AROSE) database with both historical and current laboratory data were selected for analysis. The historical laboratory data were compared with the current autoantibody tests done at the reference laboratory and tested for agreement using percent agreement and Kappa statistic. Serologic tests included ANA, anti-dsDNA, anti-Smith, anti-ribonucleoprotein (RNP), anti-Ro, anti-La, rheumatoid factor (RF), C3 and C4. Among those historically negative for immunologic markers, a current assessment of the markers by the reference laboratory generally yielded a low percentage of additional positives (3-13%). However, 6/11 (55%) of those historically negative for ANA were positive by the reference laboratory, and the reference laboratory test also identified 20% more patients with anti-RNP and 18% more with RF. Among those historically positive for immunologic markers, the reference laboratory results were generally positive on the same laboratory test (range 57% to 97%). However, among those with a history of low C3 or C4, the current reference laboratory results indicated low C3 or C4 a low percentage of the time (18% and 39%, respectively). ANA positivity remained positive over time, in contrast to previous studies. Anti-Ro, La, RNP, Smith and anti-dsDNA antibodies had subs
URI
http://search.proquest.com/docview/874655983?accountid=11283http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0961203310385738?journalCode=lupa
ISSN
0961-2033
DOI
10.1177/0961203310385738
Appears in Collections:
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S](의과대학) > MEDICINE(의학과) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE