165 0

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author임미원-
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-19T02:36:15Z-
dc.date.available2018-02-19T02:36:15Z-
dc.date.issued2012-06-
dc.identifier.citation법과 사회,Vol.42 No.- [2012],p289-31en_US
dc.identifier.issn1227-0954-
dc.identifier.urihttp://kiss.kstudy.com/thesis/thesis-view.asp?key=3072080-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11754/38057-
dc.description.abstractRecently the legal and political theorists have paid attention to Hobbes` political philosophy. It is related not only to the postmodern ``bio-corporeal turn`` but also to the serious challenge to the politics. Agamben has explored Hobbes` theory of ``the state of Nature`` and compares it to Schmitt`s thoughts about ``the state of Exception``. Agamben`s critical analysis is grounded in his opposition to the sovereign violence that produces the meaningless ``bare life`` by means of ``inclusive exclusion``. Schmitt has recognized the significant relationship between Hobbes` state of Nature and his own concept of the ``Political``, defined by the existential enmity. But he has opposed to Hobbes` stark notion of the depolitizing individualistic liberalism. Foucault has analysed Hobbes` theory as discourse of sovereign supremacy and obedience. On Foucault`s account the traditional sovereign politics is in eighteenth century replaced by the modern governmentality that is based on the elements of the population, the political economics, and the technique of security. Foucault has considered the rise of economic reason and liberal governmentality as the essential and effective transformation of political power. Grounded on her political pathos Arendt has accused Hobbes of the logic of the liberal individualism and imperialism that prolong the ``state of Nature`` and bring about the fatal decline of politics and public realms. To that extent these theorists have reconstructed their own political thoughts by means of ``postmodern Hobbes``. They have intended commonly the regeneration of the politics and the political consciousness.en_US
dc.description.sponsorship이 논문은 2012년도 한양대학교 교내연구비 지원으로 연구되었음(HY-2012-G)en_US
dc.language.isoko_KRen_US
dc.publisher법과사회이론학회en_US
dc.subject홉스en_US
dc.subject슈미트en_US
dc.subject아감벤en_US
dc.subject푸코en_US
dc.subject아렌트en_US
dc.subject정치en_US
dc.subject생명en_US
dc.subjectHobbesen_US
dc.subjectSchmitten_US
dc.subjectAgambenen_US
dc.subjectFoucaulten_US
dc.subjectArendten_US
dc.subjectPoliticsen_US
dc.subjectLifeen_US
dc.title홉스의 법 및 정치사상에 대한 재해석 가능성: 슈미트, 아감벤, 푸코, 아렌트의 홉스 해석을 중심으로en_US
dc.title.alternativeThe Reinterpretation of Hobbes` Legal and political philosophy: Focusing on the Hobbes-interpretation of Schmitt, Agamben, Foucault, and Arendten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.no42-
dc.relation.page289-318-
dc.relation.journal법과사회-
dc.contributor.googleauthor임미원-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLim, Mi Won-
dc.relation.code2012214330-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakSCHOOL OF LAW[S]-
dc.sector.departmentHanyang University Law School-
dc.identifier.pidlimmw-
Appears in Collections:
SCHOOL OF LAW[S](법학전문대학원) > Hanyang University Law School(법학전문대학원) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE