Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 정규원 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-02-07T08:35:13Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-02-07T08:35:13Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011-06 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 법학논총. Vol. 28 No. 2 (2011) pg. 27, 14 p. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1225-228x | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://kiss.kstudy.com/thesis/thesis-view.asp?key=2942720 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001563724 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Informed consent is one of the main demands in medical practices. Because xenotransplantation is a type of medical practices, it also needs informed consent of patient. Informed consent is valid, if the patient is competent, has sufficient understanding about the relevant information, and consents freely; competency, understanding, and voluntariness. However, the patient who would be a subject of xenotransplantation may not have another choice other than receiving xenografts because if he may not he would die. So, voluntariness of consent in xenotransplantation should be examined carefully. Also, sufficient understanding of the relevant information may not be satisfied. Patient may not sufficiently understand the relevant information because there is no or enough relevant information about xenotransplantation. Another issue which is related with xenotransplantation is informed consent of patient’s relatives. They may be kept a close watch by the medical professionals during their life because of the patient who lives with them. If they do not give informed consent they may not live with patient any more. So, voluntariness of informed consent of patient’s relatives should be examined carefully. Also, sufficient understanding of relevant information by patient’s relatives should be considered. If we can not meet the elements of informed consent in xenotransplantation, we should consider the modification of the elements of informed consent or other ethical principles which would supplement informed consent. Beneficence would be an ethical principle which can make up for it’s fault. Informed consent is not the only element which should be considered in medical practices. Also, we should consider medical professionals’ autonomy as well as patients’ one. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | 본 연구는 교육과학기술부가 지원하는 “바이오장기의 윤리적 고찰 및 산업적 발전방안 연구(과제번호: 31201000000001194)”의 일환으로 이루어진 것이다. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | ko_KR | en_US |
dc.publisher | 한양대학교 법학연구소 | en_US |
dc.subject | 바이오장기연구 | en_US |
dc.subject | 충분한설명에근거한동의 | en_US |
dc.subject | 충분한설명에근거한동의 | en_US |
dc.subject | Xenotransplantation | en_US |
dc.subject | 자발성 | en_US |
dc.subject | Understanding | en_US |
dc.subject | Bioethics and Safety Act | en_US |
dc.subject | Informed Consent | en_US |
dc.subject | Understanding | en_US |
dc.subject | Voluntariness | en_US |
dc.title | 바이오장기 이식에 있어서 환자의 동의 | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Informed Consent in Xenotransplantation | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.relation.no | 2호 | - |
dc.relation.volume | 28집 | - |
dc.relation.page | 28-40 | - |
dc.relation.journal | 법학논총 | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | 정규원 | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Jung, Kyu Won | - |
dc.relation.code | 2012214068 | - |
dc.sector.campus | S | - |
dc.sector.daehak | SCHOOL OF LAW[S] | - |
dc.sector.department | Hanyang University Law School | - |
dc.identifier.pid | dike1 | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.