184 0

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author제철웅-
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-09T02:30:10Z-
dc.date.available2018-01-09T02:30:10Z-
dc.date.issued2016-03-
dc.identifier.citation가족법연구, v. 30, NO 1, Page. 173-218en_US
dc.identifier.issn1225-1224-
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholar.dkyobobook.co.kr/searchDetail.laf?barcode=4010024820016#-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11754/34272-
dc.description.abstractUnder the new adult guardianship system, which was introduced by the Adult Guardianship Act 2011 (the Revising Some Part of Civil Code Act), legal person can be appointed as a guardian. This paper deals with the necessities not only of opening to legal persons the possibilities of providing guardianship services including supervisory guardianship services, but also of letting legal persons participate in the operation of the new adult guardianship system. The operation of guardianship system can, by its nature, be subject to family courts and an administration department, whose proper candidates can be ministry of health and welfare and ministry of justice, but which this paper premises is ministry of health and welfare. In this regard, this paper suggests that even though it is necessary for legal persons to be invited to participate in the operation of adult guardianship system, the provision of guardianship services cannot be restricted to legal persons which are invited to participate in the operation of guardianship system. In other words, it in unnecessary to regulate the qualification of legal persons eligible for the provision of guardianship services by special acts. The provision of guardianship services is open to all the legal persons, regardless of whether non-profit organization or for-profit organization. On the other hand, Moreover this paper suggests that the choice and role of legal persons which are invited to participate in the operation of guardianship system be regulated in each social welfare laws relevant to persons with dementia, persons with developmental disabilities and persons with mental illness. For supporting the arguments it suggests, this paper introduces the role models from UK, Germany, Japan, Taiwan and Korean practices.en_US
dc.description.sponsorship이 논문은 2013년도 한국연구재단의 한국사회과학지원(SSK)사업의 지원(NRF-2013S1A3A2043353)에 의하여 연구된 것임.en_US
dc.language.isoko_KRen_US
dc.publisher한국가족법학회en_US
dc.subject법인후견en_US
dc.subject후견법인en_US
dc.subject성년후견제도이용지원en_US
dc.subject후견제도en_US
dc.subject자기결정권의 존중en_US
dc.subjectCorporation Guardianship Serviceen_US
dc.subjectGuardianship Corporationen_US
dc.subjectAssistance for the Use of Guardianship Serviceen_US
dc.subjectGuardianship Systemen_US
dc.subjectRespect to Self-Determinationen_US
dc.title후견법인의 역할과 기능에 관한 입법적 제안: 후견제도 운영 주체로 설정할 필요성을 중심으로en_US
dc.title.alternativeA Legislative Proposal for the Role and Function of Guardianship Corporations: Focused on the Necessity of Setting Guardianship Corporations as Operating Entities for the Guardianship Systemen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.no1-
dc.relation.volume30-
dc.relation.page173-218-
dc.relation.journal가족법연구-
dc.contributor.googleauthor제철웅-
dc.contributor.googleauthor김원태-
dc.contributor.googleauthor이용표-
dc.contributor.googleauthor이세희-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJe, Cheol Ung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Won Tae-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Yong Pyo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Se Hee-
dc.relation.code2016018186-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakSCHOOL OF LAW[S]-
dc.sector.departmentHanyang University Law School-
dc.identifier.pidcuje-
Appears in Collections:
SCHOOL OF LAW[S](법학전문대학원) > Hanyang University Law School(법학전문대학원) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE