247 0

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author이호영-
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-18T05:42:41Z-
dc.date.available2017-08-18T05:42:41Z-
dc.date.issued2015-11-
dc.identifier.citation경쟁법연구, v. 32, Page. 253-289en_US
dc.identifier.issn1598-2335-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.competitionlaw.or.kr/bbs/?t=J-
dc.identifier.urihttp://kiss.kstudy.com/journal/thesis_name.asp?tname=kiss2002&key=3406803-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11754/28582-
dc.description.abstractUnreasonable interference of business activities, a type of unfair trade practices prohibited under Article 23 of the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act has a unique nature in that it is very hard to distinguish illegal unreasonable interference from legal aggressive pro-competitive business practices which the Act should encourage. In particular, when interference with the competitor’s business is performed by means of rendering beneficial treatments to dealers for promoting one’s own business, the distinction between illegal and legal one is blurred. The issue is what contents and judging criteria of the requirement of tendency to impede fair trade as provided for in Article 23(1) are. This issue is inter-wound with the regulation scheme for unilateral conduct under the Korea Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act. This article looks into the legislative history of the prohibition on unreasonable interference of business activities on the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act and compares it with related provision under the Japanese Antimonopoly Act. Then, it discusses the theories and court decisions on the requirement of tendency to impede fair trade. On the foundation of those discussions, it analyses the policy basis for prohibiting unreasonable interference of business activities under a competition law and figures out judging criteria for tendency to impede fair trade in unreasonable interference of business activities cases.en_US
dc.description.sponsorship이 논문은 2013년도 정부재원(교육과학기술부 인문사회연구역량강화사업비)으로 한국연구재단의 지원(NRF-2013-S1A3A2053586) 및 한양대학교 교내연구지원사업(HY-2014년도)으로 연구되었습니다.en_US
dc.language.isoko_KRen_US
dc.publisher한국경쟁법학회en_US
dc.subject사업활동방해en_US
dc.subject공정거래저해성en_US
dc.subject불공정한 거래방법en_US
dc.subject공정경쟁저해성en_US
dc.subject불공정거래행위en_US
dc.subject단독행위en_US
dc.subject부당염매en_US
dc.subjectunreasonable interference of business activitiesen_US
dc.subjectunfair trade practiceen_US
dc.subjecttendency to impede fair tradeen_US
dc.subjectunreasonable selling at price lower than costsen_US
dc.subjectunilateral conducten_US
dc.subjectMonopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Acten_US
dc.title공정거래법상 사업활동방해의 공정거래저해성 - 공정거래위원회 의결 제2013-142호(2013.7.11.)의 사실관계를 중심으로en_US
dc.title.alternativeTendency to Impede Fair Trade of Interfering Business Activities under the Monopoly Regulation Acten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.volume32-
dc.relation.page253-289-
dc.relation.journal경쟁법연구-
dc.contributor.googleauthor이호영-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Ho Young-
dc.relation.code2015040253-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakSCHOOL OF LAW[S]-
dc.sector.departmentHanyang University Law School-
dc.identifier.pidhoylee-
Appears in Collections:
SCHOOL OF LAW[S](법학전문대학원) > Hanyang University Law School(법학전문대학원) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE