309 66

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author박훈기-
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-02T02:13:25Z-
dc.date.available2017-08-02T02:13:25Z-
dc.date.issued2015-10-
dc.identifier.citationkorean journal of family practice, v. 5, NO 3, suppl. 2, Page. 547-551en_US
dc.identifier.issn2233-9019-
dc.identifier.issn2233-9116-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.kjfp.or.kr/journal/view.html?uid=325&vmd=Full-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11754/28184-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The objective of this study was to compare the relative usefulness of measuring body fat percentage by bioimpedance, BMI, and waist circumference, respectively, for the purpose of predicting metabolic syndrome. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we studied 14,400 subjects between the ages of 20-80 years. Spearman correlation analysis was performed to confirm correlation coefficients between BMI, waist circumference, body fat percentage and metabolic syndrome. Logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the odds ratio between three obesity indicators and metabolic syndrome. Results: In the Spearman correlation analysis, the correlation between body fat percentage and waist circumference and the correlation between body fat percentage and BMI were less than the correlation between BMI and waist circumference. (Body fat percentage and waist circumference =0.61, body fat percentage and BMI=0.69, BMI and waist circumference=0.81 in males; and body fat percentage and waist circumference=0.61, body fat percentage and BMI=0.74, 0.77 in females). Body fat percentage, BMI and waist circumference all showed statistically significant correlation to metabolic syndrome in the logistic regression analysis (waist circumference: odds ratio(OR)=1.11, BMI:OR=1.09, body fat percentage: OR=1.05 in males, waist circumference: OR 1.15, BMI:OR=1.08, body fat percentage: OR=1.03 in females, P≤0.05). In the univariate analysis the odds ratio of body fat percentage was the highest among the three indicators in males (OR=1.17, 95%CI 1.15-1.18, P≤0.05) Conclusion: Assessment of total body fat percentage by bioimpedence, waist circumference or body mass index are similar in predicting metabolic syndrome.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisher대한가정의학회en_US
dc.subjectBody fat percentageen_US
dc.subjectBIAen_US
dc.subjectMetabolic syndromeen_US
dc.titleComparison of BMI, WC, and Body Fat Percentage in Predicting Metabolic Syndromeen_US
dc.title.alternative체질량지수, 허리둘레 및 체지방률 측정이 지니는 대사증후군 예측 지표로서의 효용성 비교en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.no3-
dc.relation.volume5-
dc.relation.page547-551-
dc.relation.journalkorean journal of family practice-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHong, Ju-Hyung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Wook-Yong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHwang, Hwan-Sik-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, Hoon-Ki-
dc.contributor.googleauthor홍주형-
dc.contributor.googleauthor이욱용-
dc.contributor.googleauthor황환식-
dc.contributor.googleauthor박훈기-
dc.relation.code2015041830-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S]-
dc.sector.departmentDEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE-
dc.identifier.pidhoonkp-


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE