333 0

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author박재우-
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-06T01:02:26Z-
dc.date.available2017-03-06T01:02:26Z-
dc.date.issued2015-06-
dc.identifier.citation지하수토양환경, v. 20, NO 3, Page. 7-14en_US
dc.identifier.issn1598-6438-
dc.identifier.issn2287-8831-
dc.identifier.urihttp://koreascience.or.kr/article/ArticleFullRecord.jsp?cn=JGSTB5_2015_v20n3_7-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11754/25840-
dc.description.abstractIn this study, land farming and chemical oxidation of a diesel-contaminated site is compared to evaluate the environmental impact during soil remediation using the Spreadsheet for Environmental Footprint Analysis by U.S. EPA. Each remediation process is divided into four phases, consisting of soil excavation, backfill and transportation (Phase 0), construction of remediation facility (Phase 1), remediation operation (Phase 2), and restoration of site and waste disposal (Phase 3). Environmental footprints, such as material use, energy consumption, air emission, water use and waste generation, are analyzed to find the way to minimize the environmental impact. In material use and waste generation, land farming has more environmental effect than chemical oxidation due to the concrete and backfill material used to construct land farming facility in Phase 1. Also, in energy use, land farming use about six times more energy than chemical oxidation because of cement production and fuel use of heavy machinery, such as backhoe and truck. However, carbon dioxide, commonly considered as important factor of environmental impact due to global warming effect, is emitted more in chemical oxidation because of hydrogen peroxide production. Water use of chemical oxidation is also 2.1 times higher than land farming.en_US
dc.description.sponsorship본 연구는 환경부 “토양지하수오염방지기술개발사업 (The GAIA Project, (2012000550001)) 복합오염녹색연구단 과제”로 지원받았습니다.en_US
dc.language.isoko_KRen_US
dc.publisher한국지하수토양환경학회en_US
dc.subjectGreen remediationen_US
dc.subjectFootprint analysisen_US
dc.subjectLife cycle assessmenten_US
dc.subjectLand farmingen_US
dc.subjectChemical oxidationen_US
dc.title환경적 footprint 분석을 통한 토양경작법과 화학적산화법의 비교en_US
dc.title.alternativeComparison of Land Farming and Chemical Oxidation based on Environmental Footprint Analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.no3-
dc.relation.volume20-
dc.identifier.doi10.7857/JSGE.2015.20.3.007-
dc.relation.page7-14-
dc.relation.journal지하수토양환경-
dc.contributor.googleauthor김윤수-
dc.contributor.googleauthor임형석-
dc.contributor.googleauthor박재우-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Yun-Soo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLim, Hyung-Suk-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, Jae-Woo-
dc.relation.code2015040934-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF ENGINEERING[S]-
dc.sector.departmentDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-
dc.identifier.pidjaewoopark-
Appears in Collections:
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING[S](공과대학) > CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING(건설환경공학과) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE