388 0

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author김재준-
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-04T01:09:49Z-
dc.date.available2016-08-04T01:09:49Z-
dc.date.issued2015-02-
dc.identifier.citation대한건축학회논문집 계획계, v. 31, NO 2, Page. 110-120en_US
dc.identifier.issn1226-9093-
dc.identifier.issn2384-177X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/ArticleDetail/NODE06142030-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11754/22401-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study is to extract fusion-required academic fields and fusion priority based on the various relationship between other academic fields and architecture·urban academic fields. Initial set of academic fields were gathered through practical worker-oriented survey (respondents: 254) in related academic fields. Then final set of academic fields (21 fields, 120 subjects) were reclassified through investigation of previous studies and cases of other fusion education. The result of this study is based on the expert survey (respondents: 37). Research finding are as follow, the first is that the sector-1 academic fields (economics, energy and resources, business management, environment, law) had high practical usability, academic relationship, expected effect. So these academic fields could be consider a fusion firstly. The second is that the sector-3 academic fields (electronics, mechanical engineering, medical engineering) had low practical usability, academic relationship, relatively high expected effect. According to this result, sector-3 academic fields could be consider a fusion in mid- and long-term point of view. The last is that the sector-2 academic fields (information and communication technology, human sensibility ergonomics) had low practical usability, intermediate academic relationship, slightly high expected effect. Therefore sector-2 academic fields could be consider a fusion in mid- short-term point of view.en_US
dc.language.isoko_KRen_US
dc.publisher대한건축학회en_US
dc.subject건축en_US
dc.subject도시en_US
dc.subject융복합 학문분야en_US
dc.subject전문가 설문조사en_US
dc.subjectArchitecture and Urbanen_US
dc.subjectFusion Academic Fielden_US
dc.subjectExpert Surveyen_US
dc.title건축·도시분야의 융복합 대상 학문분야 도출을 위한 방법론적 접근- 전문가 설문조사를 중심으로en_US
dc.title.alternativeA Quantitative Approach for the Extraction of Fusion-required Academic Field in the Architecture and Urban Sectors - focused on the Expert Survey -en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.no2-
dc.relation.volume31-
dc.identifier.doi10.5659/JAIK_PD.2015.31.2.111-
dc.relation.page110-120-
dc.relation.journal대한건축학회논문집 계획계-
dc.contributor.googleauthor유승규-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoo, Seung-Kyu-
dc.contributor.googleauthor김재준-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Jae-Jun-
dc.contributor.googleauthor여옥경-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYeo, Ok-Kyung-
dc.relation.code2015040771-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF ENGINEERING[S]-
dc.sector.departmentDEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING-
dc.identifier.pidjjkim-
Appears in Collections:
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING[S](공과대학) > ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING(건축공학부) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE