175 0

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author조형래-
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-25T00:49:13Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-25T00:49:13Z-
dc.date.issued2021-02-
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF PERIANESTHESIA NURSING, v. 36, no. 3, page. 247-252en_US
dc.identifier.issn1089-9472; 1532-8473en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1089947220303178?via%3Dihuben_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.hanyang.ac.kr/handle/20.500.11754/175758-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: In general anesthesia, the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is a frequently used effective option. The effect of nitrous oxide on intracuff pressure of the LMA and postoperative sore throat is well known; however, there are no studies related to the second-generation LMA Protector. The purpose of this study was to determine the differences in intracuff pressure and postoperative sore throat, depending on the use of nitrous oxide during general anesthesia using the LMA Protector. Design: This randomized double-blind prospective study was conducted among 88 patients aged 20 to 70 years. Methods: The cuff pressure started with a baseline of 40 cm H2O and was measured using a digital cuff pressure manometer for 30 minutes. Postoperative sore throat, dysphonia, dysphagia, and numeric rating scale scores were also recorded. Findings: Over time, the intracuff pressure of the nitrous oxide group increased significantly compared with that of the air group. Furthermore, postoperative sore throat and pharyngolaryngeal complications were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions: Intracuff pressure of the LMA Protector increased during anesthesia using nitrous oxide. When the anesthesia time was less than 2 hours, however, there was no difference in postoperative sore throat.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INCen_US
dc.subjectlaryngeal masks; pressure; postoperative complicationsen_US
dc.titleComparison of Intracuff Pressure and Postoperative Sore Throat Following Use of Laryngeal Mask Airway Protector With or Without Nitrous Oxide Anesthesiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jopan.2020.10.001en_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF PERIANESTHESIA NURSING-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Young Uk-
dc.contributor.googleauthorCho, Byong Hyon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorCho, Hyung Rae-
dc.relation.code2021003062-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S]-
dc.sector.departmentDEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE-
dc.identifier.pidcallmex-
dc.identifier.researcherIDM-6969-2016-
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1634-7482-
Appears in Collections:
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S](의과대학) > MEDICINE(의학과) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE