153 0

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author이승훈-
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-19T04:25:16Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-19T04:25:16Z-
dc.date.issued2020-12-
dc.identifier.citationJCR-JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, v. 28, no. 1, page. E26-E32en_US
dc.identifier.issn1076-1608-
dc.identifier.issn1536-7355-
dc.identifier.urihttps://journals.lww.com/jclinrheum/Fulltext/2022/01000/Efficacy_and_Safety_of_Intra_articular_Sacroiliac.16.aspx-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.hanyang.ac.kr/handle/20.500.11754/172945-
dc.description.abstractBackground/Aims: To assess the efficacy and safety of intra-articular sacroiliac glucocorticoid injection in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Methods: Patients with AS undergoing fluoroscopy-guided intra-articular sacroiliac glucocorticoid injection were enrolled between 2012 and 2018. Efficacy was assessed by numeric pain rating scale, acute phase reactants, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index, and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS). Patients who started biologics within 3 months despite the intervention were compared with those not starting biologics, hence: the nonbiologic group. Results: A total of 96 patients were treated, with a total of 107 injections. After intervention, there were significant decreases in numeric pain rating scale (7.8 ± 1.8 vs. 3.3 ± 2.2, p < 0.001) and acute phase reactants level (erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR] 23.0 mm/h [10.0–47.0 mm/h] vs. 13.0 mm/h [4.0–27.0 mm/h], p < 0.001; C-reactive protein [CRP] 1.0 mg/dL [0.2–2.7 mg/dL] vs. 0.2 mg/dL [0.2–0.9 mg/dL], p < 0.001). Disease activity scores also decreased for BASDAI (6.2 ± 1.8 vs. 4.5 ± 2.5, p = 0.001), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (5.5 [4.1–7.0] vs. 1.8 [0.5–4.1], p = 0.001), ASDAS-CRP (2.9 ± 1.0 vs. 2.3 ± 1.3, p = 0.046), and ASDAS-ESR (3.7 ± 1.1 vs. 2.4 ± 1.3, p < 0.001). However, 12 patients (12.5%) started biologics within 3 months. These patients showed higher ESR (91.0 mm/h [IQR 21.0–113.0 mm/h] vs. 21.5 mm/h [IQR 9.5–43.0 mm/h], p = 0.010), CRP (8.0 mg/dL [IQR 1.11–17.1 mg/dL] vs. 0.8 mg/dL [IQR 0.2–1.8 mg/dL], p = 0.002), BASDAI (7.4 ± 1.2 vs. 5.9 ± 1.8, p = 0.027), and ASDAS-CRP (4.0 ± 0.5 vs. 2.8 ± 1.0, p = 0.004) than the nonbiologic group. There was no serious adverse event. Conclusions: Intra-articular sacroiliac glucocorticoid injection can be a safe and effective treatment option for active sacroiliitis in AS.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINSen_US
dc.subjectankylosing spondylitisen_US
dc.subjectglucocorticoid injectionen_US
dc.subjectintra-articular injectionen_US
dc.subjectsacroiliitisen_US
dc.titleEfficacy and Safety of Intra-articular Sacroiliac Glucocorticoid Injections in Ankylosing Spondylitisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/RHU.0000000000001584-
dc.relation.page1-7-
dc.relation.journalJCR-JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY-
dc.contributor.googleauthorNam, Bora-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Tae-Hwan-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Sung Won-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Hyunah-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Yun Jin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJun, Jae-Bum-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Seunghun-
dc.relation.code2020051482-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S]-
dc.sector.departmentDEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE-
dc.identifier.pidradsh-
Appears in Collections:
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S](의과대학) > MEDICINE(의학과) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE