Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author국형돈-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-30T00:21:13Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-30T00:21:13Z-
dc.date.issued2020-11-
dc.identifier.citationEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, v. 61, no. 2, page. 287-295en_US
dc.identifier.issn1078-5884-
dc.identifier.issn1532-2165-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107858842030914X?via%3Dihub-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.hanyang.ac.kr/handle/20.500.11754/172614-
dc.description.abstractObjective: There have been limited clinical trials comparing drug eluting stents (DESs) and drug coated balloons (DCBs) in the treatment of femoropopliteal artery disease. This two centre retrospective and prospective cohort study sought to compare DES with DCB for the treatment of native femoropopliteal artery disease. Methods: A total of 288 limbs (242 patients) with native femoropopliteal artery disease were treated with DESs (Zilver PTX; 102 limbs) or DCBs (IN.PACT Admiral; 186 limbs) in two Korean endovascular centres between 19 January 2013 and 5 May 2018 and followed for a median duration of 19.6 months. The primary endpoint was primary clinical patency. Propensity score matching (PSM, 162 limbs) and inverse probability weighted (IPW) adjustment were performed to adjust for confounding baseline characteristics. Results: The DCB group had fewer lesions with Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) II type C/D (55.9% vs. 70.6%, p = .021) or total occlusions (43.5% vs. 77.5%, p < .001) and showed shorter lesion lengths (164.2 ± 105.4 mm vs. 194.8 ± 86.8 mm, p = .009) than the DES group. After PSM, baseline clinical and lesion characteristics of the two groups were comparable except for larger reference vessel diameter in the DES group (5.4 ± 0.6 vs. 5.1 ± 0.7, p = .025). Adjunctive atherectomy was performed in 32.1% of the DCB group and in 2.5% of the DES group (p < .001). The provisional stenting was required in 14.8% of the DCB group. At two year follow up, the DCB group showed higher primary clinical patency (74.6% vs. 56.7%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27–0.96, p = .032) and freedom from target lesion revascularisation (85.9% vs. 71.3%, HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.17–0.89, p = .021) than the DES group. Survival from all cause death did not differ between groups (87.6% vs. 92.1%, HR 1.85, 95% CI 0.62–5.52, p = .26). Conclusion: In this two centre cohort, DCBs with selective use of adjunctive atherectomy achieved more favourable outcomes than DESs for native femoropopliteal artery disease.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by grants from the , Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (Nos. A085136 and HI15C1277), Mid-Career Researcher Program through the National Research Foundation, Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Republic of Korea (No. 2015R1A2A2A01002731), and Cardiovascular Research Centre, Seoul, Korea.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherW B SAUNDERS CO LTDen_US
dc.subjectDrug-coated balloonen_US
dc.subjectDrug-eluting stenten_US
dc.subjectEndovascularen_US
dc.subjectFemoropopliteal artery diseaseen_US
dc.titleDrug Eluting Stent vs. Drug Coated Balloon for Native Femoropopliteal Artery Disease: A Two Centre Experienceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.10.008-
dc.relation.journalEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Yong-Joon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKook, Hyungdon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKo, Young-Guk-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYu, Cheol Woong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJoo, Hyung Joon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAhn, Chul-Min-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChoi, Donghoon-
dc.relation.code2020046075-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S]-
dc.sector.departmentDEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE-
dc.identifier.pidcvkook-
Appears in Collections:
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S](의과대학) > MEDICINE(의학과) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE