84 0

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author정민성-
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-25T01:30:58Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-25T01:30:58Z-
dc.date.issued2020-01-
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, v. 73, no. 6. page. 1060-1067en_US
dc.identifier.issn1748-6815-
dc.identifier.issn1878-0539-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681520300292?via%3Dihub-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.hanyang.ac.kr/handle/20.500.11754/160855-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (TRAM) remains an effective and widely-used method for breast reconstruction despite well-documented donor-site morbidity. We present the island-type pedicled TRAM flap as a way to obtain better and more reliable outcomes in breast reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent breast reconstruction with an island-type pedicled TRAM flap was performed. Patient demographics and complications were reviewed. In the island-type pedicled TRAM flap, we transversely resected the upper ipsilateral rectus muscle surrounding the origin of the superior epigastric vessels, preserving only a 1-cm muscle strip including the vascular pedicle to prevent epigastric bulging and inframammary fold (IMF) disruption. The flap was turned over into the ipsilateral breast pocket. The IMF was repaired except for the portion where the pedicle was placed. Results: From January 2013 to November 2017, 88 patients underwent surgery using the island-type pedicled TRAM flap. The etiology of the defect was breast cancer with mastectomy in 86 cases, and paraffinoma in two cases. Seventy-seven patients underwent unilateral reconstruction, and 11 patients underwent bilateral reconstruction. Minor fat necrosis occurred in eight cases. Mild inframammary or epigastric bulging was observed in five cases, and neither partial nor total flap necrosis was observed. The aesthetic outcome of the IMF was evaluated in 55 cases, and 53 cases received good overall scores. Conclusion: Although the island-type pedicled TRAM flap is technically challenging because careful dissection and pedicle identification is required, it can provide more reliable and better aesthetic results without an increased risk of vascular compromise. (c) 2020 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCI LTDen_US
dc.subjectBreast reconstructionen_US
dc.subjectPedicled TRAMen_US
dc.subjectIsland typeen_US
dc.subjectInframammary folden_US
dc.titleThe island-type pedicled TRAM flap Improvement of the aesthetic outcomes of breast reconstructionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.bjps.2020.01.010-
dc.relation.page1-8-
dc.relation.journalJournal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoon, Jung Soo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorOh, Jeongseok-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChung, Min Sung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAhn, Hee Chang-
dc.relation.code2020014899-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S]-
dc.sector.departmentDEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE-
dc.identifier.pidbovie-
Appears in Collections:
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S](의과대학) > MEDICINE(의학과) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE