11 0

Privacy versus open science

Title
Privacy versus open science
Author
임형욱
Keywords
Privacy; Open science; Open repositories; Differential privacy
Issue Date
2019-08
Publisher
SPRINGER
Citation
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, v. 51, no. 4, Page. 1839-1848
Abstract
Pervasive internet and sensor technologies promise to revolutionize psychological science. However, the data collected using these technologies are often very personal-indeed, the value of the data is often directly related to how personal they are. At the same time, driven by the replication crisis, there is a sustained push to publish data to open repositories. These movements are in fundamental conflict. In this article, we propose a way to navigate this issue. We argue that there are significant advantages to be gained by ceding the ownership of data to the participants who generate the data. We then provide desiderata for a privacy-preserving platform. In particular, we suggest that researchers should use an interface to perform experiments and run analyses, rather than observing the stimuli themselves. We argue that this method not only improves privacy but will also encourage greater compliance with good research practices than is possible through open repositories.
URI
https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758%2Fs13428-019-01259-5https://repository.hanyang.ac.kr/handle/20.500.11754/153677
ISSN
1554-351X; 1554-3528
DOI
10.3758/s13428-019-01259-5
Appears in Collections:
ETC[S] > 연구정보
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE