Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author홍수진-
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-31T04:53:37Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-31T04:53:37Z-
dc.date.issued2019-06-
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF THE BELGIAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGY, v. 103, no. 1, article no. 37en_US
dc.identifier.issn2514-8281-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.jbsr.be/article/10.5334/jbsr.1764/-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.hanyang.ac.kr/handle/20.500.11754/151997-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To provide a comprehensive review of radiological clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and to establish their characteristics and impact in the field of radiology. Material and Methods: A MEDLINE search was performed for CPGs in which at least half of the authors were from the radiology or imaging department. The following information was extracted from each CPG: year of publication, journal, provider, number of authors, number of pages, number of references, collaboration, country of origin, radiological subspecialty, imaging modality used, topic, source of funding, and number and pattern of citations. Results: In total, 120 radiological CPGs published between July 2006 and June 2016 were identified. One hundred nine (90.8%) radiological CPGs were published in radiology journals, 96 (80.0%) were provided by the scientific community, 108 (90.0%) were collaborative studies, 64 (53.3%) originated from the United States, 36 (30.0%) were concerned with the field of vascular/interventional radiology, 38 (31.7%) used combined imaging techniques, 52 (43.3%) were focused on interpretation and management, and 118 (98.4%) were not funded. Radiological CPGs included a median of 8 authors, 9 pages, and 49 references. The median number of citations and annual citations were 18 (range, 0-540) and 3.5 (range, 0-75.6), respectively. Conclusion: Our study presents several interesting insights into the characteristics and impact of radiological CPGs.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUBIQUITY PRESS LTDen_US
dc.subjectbibliometricsen_US
dc.subjectpublicationen_US
dc.subjectradiologistsen_US
dc.subjectclinical practice guidelineen_US
dc.subjectradiologic guidelineen_US
dc.subjectcomprehensive reviewen_US
dc.titleRadiological Clinical Practice Guidelines Published in the Last Decade: A Bibliometric Analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.no1-
dc.relation.volume103-
dc.identifier.doi10.5334/jbsr.1764-
dc.relation.page1-5-
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF THE BELGIAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGY-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHong, Su Jin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoon, Dae Young-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLim, Kyoung Ja-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMoon, Ji Yoon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoon, Soo Jeong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeo, Young Lan-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYun, Eun Joo-
dc.relation.code2019043570-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S]-
dc.sector.departmentDEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE-
dc.identifier.pidsjhrad-


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE