공공연구기관의 기술이전사업화 영향요인에 관한 연구

Abstract

국가의 지원을 통해 연구개발을 수행하며 성과를 창출하는 공공연구기관의 경우에는 연구 성과의 확산을 통한 공공성의 확보가 요구된다. 또한 확산의 대가인 수익의 재투자로 인한 신규 연구개발의 창출이 또 하나의 역할로 제시된다. 하지만 현재 우리나라의 공공연구기관은 사업화 방식이 다양하지 못하고, 다른 나라의 공공연구기관과 비교하여 낮은 생산성을 보이는 등 기술사업화 실적이 매우 저조한 수준이다. 공공연구기관의 성과확산을 통한 공공의 이익창출을 위해서는 기술이전사업화를 활성화시키기 위한 실질적 전략이 필요하다. 이러한 기술이전 활성화 전략을 수립하기 위한 기본 과정으로 기술이전사업화에 영향을 미치는 다수의 요인에 대한 심도 있는 분석이 선행되어야 한다. 이러한 이유로 본 연구에서는 기존연구의 분석을 통해 기술이전사업화 영향요인을 도출하고, 이를 체계화 하여 하나의 지표로 구성하였다. 또한 기술이전사업화 영향요인을 상위 영향요인과 하위 영향요인으로 세분화 한 후, 설문을 통해 기술이전의 양 당사자인 기술제공자와 기술수요자 측면에서 각각의 중요도를 산출하였다. 산출된 중요도를 바탕으로 기술이전사업화 영향요인의 순위를 도출하였으며, 이에 대한 기술제공자와 기술수요자의 인식의 차이를 비교하였다. 기술이전사업화 영향요인의 도출과 체계화 결과의 활용 방안을 제시하였으며, 기술이전 양당사자의 인식의 차이에 관한 연구 결과를 활용하여, 기술이전사업화의 이해관계자들의 역할을 제안하였다.|Public research institutions, which carry out R&D(research and development) with national support, are required to secure publicity by promulgating the results. They also need to reinvest compensating profits to achieve efficiency. However, public research institutions in Korea have few methods for commercialization and show low productivity, compared to those in other countries. In order to provide public profits by spreading research findings, a practical strategy to revitalize commercialization of technology transfer is essential. In priority, an in-depth analysis about a number of factors influencing commercialization of technology transfer has to be proceeded. On this basis, this study forms an indicator by drawing and systematizing influence factors of commercialization through an analysis of previous research. In addition, after subdividing the influence factors into super-ordinate and subordinate factors, criticality of the factors was measured in each term for technology-provider and technology-recipient through a survey. Based on the criticality rank was conducted a comparison of recognition between technology providers and recipients. After researching influence factors of technology commercialization and presenting applicable method of systematized results, this study proposes a role for related executives making due allowances for the study result about recognition difference between technology providers and recipients.; Public research institutions, which carry out R&D(research and development) with national support, are required to secure publicity by promulgating the results. They also need to reinvest compensating profits to achieve efficiency. However, public research institutions in Korea have few methods for commercialization and show low productivity, compared to those in other countries. In order to provide public profits by spreading research findings, a practical strategy to revitalize commercialization of technology transfer is essential. In priority, an in-depth analysis about a number of factors influencing commercialization of technology transfer has to be proceeded. On this basis, this study forms an indicator by drawing and systematizing influence factors of commercialization through an analysis of previous research. In addition, after subdividing the influence factors into super-ordinate and subordinate factors, criticality of the factors was measured in each term for technology-provider and technology-recipient through a survey. Based on the criticality rank was conducted a comparison of recognition between technology providers and recipients. After researching influence factors of technology commercialization and presenting applicable method of systematized results, this study proposes a role for related executives making due allowances for the study result about recognition difference between technology providers and recipients.