444 198

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author신진호-
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-08T08:33:03Z-
dc.date.available2019-12-08T08:33:03Z-
dc.date.issued2018-06-
dc.identifier.citationTRIALS, v. 19, Article no. 324en_US
dc.identifier.issn1745-6215-
dc.identifier.urihttps://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-018-2636-1-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.hanyang.ac.kr/handle/20.500.11754/119019-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The efficacy of a combination of a calcium channel blocker (CCB) plus chlorthalidone (diuretic) versus a CCB plus an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) in patients not responding to CCB monotherapy has not been evaluated previously. We plan to compare the efficacy and safety of S-amlodipine (CCB) plus chlorthalidone versus S-amlodipine plus telmisartan (ARB) combinations among hypertension patients unresponsive to amlodipine monotherapy.Methods/design: This study is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, parallel, non-inferiority phase 4 study. Hypertension patients who have been treated with amlodipine (5 mg) or S-amlodipine (2.5 mg) monotherapy for >= 2 weeks and whose mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) is greater than 90 mmHg will be randomized to either S-amlodipine (2.5 mg) plus chlorthalidone (25 mg) or S-amlodipine (2.5 mg) plus telmisartan (40 mg) therapy. The primary efficacy endpoint is mean sitting DBP change after 12 weeks of treatment. The study objective is to prove the non-inferiority of the former combination (test drug) as compared to the latter one (control) with a non-inferiority margin of 3 mmHg in mean DBP change. The secondary endpoints are 6-week DBP change, 6- and 12-week sitting systolic BP (SBP) change, and the attainment of the target BP (SBP < 140 mmHg or DBP < 90 mmHg). Urine albumin, albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR), pulse wave velocity, central BP, 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring, and body fluid composition analysis will be performed at each hospital's discretion. The sample size was estimated as 170 in total with 1:1 randomization.Discussion: This is the first study comparing the efficacy of a CCB plus chlorthalidone versus a CCB plus an ARB in patients who are not responding to CCB single therapy. The study result will help clinicians to choose between chlorthalidone and telmisartan in CCB-unresponsive patients.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by Hanlim Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Korea, under the programs of the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (SNUBH) research support (Subject No.: 06-2015-203 and IRB No.: B-1507/307-005) and was partly supported by the ITECH R&D program of MOTIE/KEIT (Project No. 10053597, Development of High-Speed Signal Processing IC and Platform for Contactless Monitoring of Bio-Signal in Vehicle).en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.subjectHypertensionen_US
dc.subjectCombinationen_US
dc.subjectCalcium channel blockeren_US
dc.subjectAngiotensin receptor blockeren_US
dc.titleS-amlodipine plus chlorthalidone vs. S-amlodipine plus telmisartan in hypertensive patients unresponsive to amlodipine monotherapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.volume19-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13063-018-2636-1-
dc.relation.page324-331-
dc.relation.journalTRIALS-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJo, Sang-Ho-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, Sung-Ji-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Eung Ju-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Soo-Joong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorCho, Hyun-Jae-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSong, Jong-Min-
dc.contributor.googleauthorShin, Jinho-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, Jin Joo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorShin, Joon-Han-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHan, Kyoo-Rok-
dc.relation.code2018009081-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S]-
dc.sector.departmentDEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE-
dc.identifier.pidjhs2003-


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE