266 99

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author한동수-
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-07T19:48:36Z-
dc.date.available2019-12-07T19:48:36Z-
dc.date.issued2018-04-
dc.identifier.citationBMC CANCER, v. 18, Article no. 365en_US
dc.identifier.issn1471-2407-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bmccancer.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12885-018-4290-0-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.hanyang.ac.kr/handle/20.500.11754/118369-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Identifying preferences for stool collection devices may help increase uptake rates for colorectal cancer screening via fecal immunochemical test (FIT). This study surveyed satisfaction with different devices utilized to collect stool samples for FIT: a conventional container and a sampling bottle (Eiken OC-Sensor).Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the National Cancer Center, Korea. Participants aged 50-74 years who used either a conventional container or a sampling bottle to collect a stool sample for FIT were asked to complete a questionnaire designed to survey their satisfaction with the stool collection process and their intentions to undergo FIT in subsequent screening rounds. In total, 1657 participants (1224 conventional container, 433 sampling bottle) were included for analysis.Results: Satisfaction with the sampling bottle was higher than that with the conventional container (79.9% vs. 73. 0%, p = 0.005, respectively; aOR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.16-2.00). Participants satisfied with the sampling bottle were more likely to be female, be of younger age (50-64 years old), have higher household income, and have prior experience with FIT. Intentions to undergo subsequent screening were stronger among those given the sampling bottle than those given the conventional container (aOR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.28-2.48).Conclusions: Satisfaction with the stool collection process was higher with the sampling bottle. However, additional studies are needed to validate whether the increased satisfaction and stronger intentions to undergo subsequent screening with the sampling bottle could actually lead to increased uptake in subsequent rounds, along with analysis of the device's cost effectiveness.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by a Korea Health Technology R&D Project grant through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI) (grant number HI14C3411). Funding bodies have no role in the study design, study setting, analysis, or writing of the manuscript.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherBIOMED CENTRAL LTDen_US
dc.subjectClorectal neoplasmen_US
dc.subjectFecal occult blood testen_US
dc.subjectColorectal cancer screeningen_US
dc.subjectSatisfactionen_US
dc.titleHigher satisfaction with an alternative collection device for stool sampling in colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical test: a cross-sectional studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.volume18-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12885-018-4290-0-
dc.relation.page1-10-
dc.relation.journalBMC CANCER-
dc.contributor.googleauthorShin, Hye Young-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSuh, Mina-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChoi, Kui Son-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHwang, Sang-Hyun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJun, Jae Kwan-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHan, Dong Soo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, You Kyoung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorOh, Jae Hwan-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Chan Wha-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Do-Hoon-
dc.relation.code2018008844-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S]-
dc.sector.departmentDEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE-
dc.identifier.pidhands-


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE