Role of second-look endoscopy and prophylactic hemostasis after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Title
- Role of second-look endoscopy and prophylactic hemostasis after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Author
- 한동수
- Keywords
- endoscopic submucosal dissection; gastric neoplasm; hemostasis; prophylaxis; second-look endoscopy
- Issue Date
- 2017-04
- Publisher
- WILEY
- Citation
- JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, v. 32, no. 4, page. 756-768
- Abstract
- Background: Although several studies have shown that second-look endoscopy does not affect the incidence of bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), the potential roles of second-look endoscopy have not been fully evaluated. This study aimed to determine the role of second-look endoscopy after ESD through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: This study conducted a systematic literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library through March 2016 using the keywords "second-look," " prophylactic hemostasis," " prophylactic haemostasis," " prevention," " prophylaxis," and " endoscopic submucosal dissection." Studies were included if they evaluated the incidence of post-ESD bleeding according to second-look endoscopy or prophylactic hemostasis during second-look endoscopy. Results: Four randomized controlled trials on post-ESD bleeding between second-look endoscopy and no second-look endoscopy and 12 non-randomized studies with a cohort design on post-ESD bleeding were included. On meta-analysis, second-look endoscopy did not affect delayed post-ESD bleeding (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 1.27 [0.80-2.00], I-2 = 0%). During second-look endoscopy, patients who were considered as high-risk for post-ESD bleeding underwent prophylactic hemostasis. Delayed post-ESD bleeding was more common in patients who were treated with hemostasis during second-look endoscopy compared with those who were not (odds ratio [ 95% confidence interval] = 3.40 [1.87-6.18], I-2 = 62%). In patients who underwent prophylactic hemostasis, the number needed to prolong a hospitalization period to avoid one additional post-ESD bleeding after discharge was 25. Conclusion: Second-look endoscopy after ESD could not reduce the risk of delayed post-ESD bleeding. Delayed post-ESD bleeding was more common in patients who underwent prophylactic hemostasis than in those who did not.
- URI
- https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jgh.13623https://repository.hanyang.ac.kr/handle/20.500.11754/113607
- ISSN
- 0815-9319; 1440-1746
- DOI
- 10.1111/jgh.13623
- Appears in Collections:
- COLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S](의과대학) > MEDICINE(의학과) > Articles
- Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
- Export
- RIS (EndNote)
- XLS (Excel)
- XML