Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 은용수 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-09-03T01:29:29Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-09-03T01:29:29Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019-03 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | PACIFIC REVIEW, v. 32, NO 2, Page. 131-149 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0951-2748 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1470-1332 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09512748.2018.1461680 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.hanyang.ac.kr/handle/20.500.11754/110101 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This article aims to address how to ensure a two-way 'dialogue' across 'the West/non-West distinction' in international studies. To this end, I first discuss three different approaches to dialogue, the Socratic, the Habermasian, and the Weberian, and clarify what kind of thing dialogue should be if it is to overcome the 'West-non-West divide' and transform the current 'Western-centric' IR into a global discipline. I argue that dialogue should be understood as reciprocal feedback from different perspectives for mutual learning. In order to achieve this goal (i.e. mutual learning), I call for an 'instrumentalist' approach to dialogue. To elucidate this point, I offer an empirical illustration. The focus here is on dialogue as mutual learning between Western-centric IR theory, more specifically constructivism, and the indigenous experience and knowledge of East Asia. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | I am grateful to Patrick Jackson, Yaqing Qin, Amitav Acharya, Barry Buzan, Peter Katzenstein as well as anonymous reviewers for their very insightful comments on earlier versions of this article. This work was supported by the research fund of Hanyang University. All remaining errors and limitations are, of course, my own. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS | en_US |
dc.subject | Global IR | en_US |
dc.subject | West-non-West divide | en_US |
dc.subject | dialogue | en_US |
dc.subject | mutual learning | en_US |
dc.subject | complementary reciprocity | en_US |
dc.subject | 'instrumentalist' approach | en_US |
dc.subject | constructivism | en_US |
dc.subject | 'superior' identity | en_US |
dc.subject | East Asia | en_US |
dc.title | Global IR through dialogue | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.relation.no | 2 | - |
dc.relation.volume | 32 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/09512748.2018.1461680 | - |
dc.relation.page | 131-149 | - |
dc.relation.journal | PACIFIC REVIEW | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Eun, Yong-Soo | - |
dc.relation.code | 2019004401 | - |
dc.sector.campus | S | - |
dc.sector.daehak | COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES[S] | - |
dc.sector.department | DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES | - |
dc.identifier.pid | ysir | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.